Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 3 August 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 3 AUGUST 2012

HOBART
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Tamara Jayne Gallahar

For Trial
Manjing Moses Mading
Peter Macuei Bona
Scott Brian Enslow
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
Trumbull-Ward
V
Michell & Anor
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Tennent

Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Mention
Keith Hunter
Cornelius John Richard Gleeson
Rebecca Therese Tilbury
Alison May Howe
Christopher John Humphreys

For Plea
RKC

11.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)
Tyler John Mayne
Matthew Wayne Leslie

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Evans

Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 am

For Mention

Tina Louise Jackson

For Bail Consent

Paul Kevin Bartlett

Trevor Leo Davern

Andrew Phillip Turner

Adrian Lloyd Reardon

JBS

Elijah Joshua Bos

For Trial (Part-Heard)
David Terrence Applebee

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania held a session on August 3, 2012, with multiple cases listed for various types of hearings. In Criminal Jurisdiction, three defendants, Manjing Moses Mading, Peter Macuei Bona, and Scott Brian Enslow, were scheduled for trial in Court 8 in Hobart. The court was tasked with determining the guilt or innocence of these individuals based on the evidence presented and the legal arguments from both the prosecution and the defence. The court also had a miscellaneous civil business hearing in Launceston via video link to Burnie, involving Trumbull-Ward versus Michell and another party. The legal issues here likely involved the interpretation and application of civil law to resolve the dispute between the parties.

The court's reasoning and outcome for the criminal cases would depend on the evidence presented, the legal arguments made by both sides, and the interpretation of the law by the judge. For the civil case, the court would consider the specifics of the dispute, the relevant laws and precedents, and any submissions made by the parties involved. The final outcome of each case would be determined by the judge's decision, which would be based on a thorough analysis of the evidence and the law. The final orders in each case would be communicated by the court after the respective hearings were concluded.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established