Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 28 September 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 28 SEPTEMBER 2012

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.

For Trial

Tony Matthew White

(Part-Heard)

For Plea

Jasmine Leanne Smith

Judd Paul Kraemers

Jonathan Patrick Fox

Anthony Michael Blackaby

In Court as in Chambers

For Bail Application

Darrel John Smith

11:00 a.m.

For Mention

HCH

JAK

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.

For Mention

Shannon James Duffy

For Application

Anton Christofer Colev

For Plea

Shannon John Elmore

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice BLOW

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing

Scott Mckibben

Resource Management & Planning Appeal Tribunal

11:00 a.m.

For Application

Gaye Marguerite Sansom

Anti-Discrimination Tribunal

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford

Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Trial (Part-Heard)

Terry Grant Abel

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.

_______________________________________________________

(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania was set to hear several cases on Friday, 28 September 2012. In Criminal Jurisdiction, Tony Matthew White was scheduled for a part-heard trial, and Jasmine Leanne Smith, Judd Paul Kraemers, Jonathan Patrick Fox, and Anthony Michael Blackaby were due to enter pleas. Darrel John Smith had a bail application set for 11:00 a.m. Shannon James Duffy was listed for a mention, while Anton Christofer Colev had an application scheduled. In Civil Jurisdiction, Scott Mckibben had a hearing against the Resource Management & Planning Appeal Tribunal, and Gaye Marguerite Sansom had an application against the Anti-Discrimination Tribunal. In Launceston, Terry Grant Abel was scheduled for a part-heard trial.

The court was tasked with addressing several legal issues in these cases. In the criminal matters, the court needed to determine the appropriate outcomes for the defendants, whether it be a trial, plea, or bail application. For the civil matters, the court needed to decide on the validity of the applications brought against the tribunals. The court's reasoning and outcome would depend on the evidence and arguments presented in each case, as well as the applicable laws and legal principles.

The court's reasoning and outcome were not provided in the text, but the final orders would likely depend on the evidence and arguments presented in each case, as well as the applicable laws and legal principles. The court would consider the merits of each application, plea, or trial, and make a decision based on the evidence and legal arguments presented. The final orders would be communicated to the parties involved in the cases.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established