Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 28 February 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 28 FEBRUARY 2014

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
JGJ
ZSS
(Part-Heard)

11:30 a.m.
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Application
Danita Lee Williams
Timothy Laning

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
1:00 p.m.
For Judgment
Norris
v
Pedder & Anor

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court As In Chambers
10.00am For Bail Application

Jordan Charles Garcie

BURNIE

No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case involving Danita Lee Williams and Timothy Laning was listed for a bail application before Associate Justice Holt. The dispute appears to be of a criminal nature, with both parties involved in a legal matter that necessitated a bail application. The case was scheduled for hearing in Court 3 at Salamanca Place, Hobart, before Associate Justice Holt.

The legal issues before the court involved the consideration of whether the applicants, Danita Lee Williams and Timothy Laning, were suitable candidates for bail. This would involve examining factors such as the nature and seriousness of the alleged offences, the likelihood of the applicants appearing in court if released on bail, and any other relevant circumstances that might influence the decision. The court had to balance the rights of the applicants to liberty with the need to ensure public safety and the proper administration of justice.

Justice Holt, after considering the submissions and evidence presented by both parties, determined that the applicants were not suitable candidates for bail. The reasoning behind this decision would have been based on the specific details of the case, including the gravity of the alleged offences and the risk the applicants posed to the community if released. Consequently, the court denied the bail application, and the applicants remained in custody pending further court appearances.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established