Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 26 April 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 26 APRIL 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Paul Fraser Catto
Yonnie Judith Kiel
ALC
James Edward Carter-Tassell
Brett Anthony Lawless

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Nathan Grant Chatters

For Plea
Andrew Richard Denny

For Breach of Bail
MLJ

2.15 p.m.
For Mention
Daniel Luke Pelham

For Plea
Glenn Sturley Meyer

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

10.00 a.m.
Amend Statement of Claim
Allison
v
Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd

2.15 p.m.
Discovery/Amend Statement of Claim
Dimmick
v
Coad

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Evans
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Sentence
Glen Bamford

For Mention
Brett Julian Robinson-Stacey
Shaun Andrew Tringrove
PTB
Trent Terrence Hill

For Bail Consent
Troy Steve Snowball

For Plea
Benjamin Leigh Fisher
Leigh Andrew Coghlan
BWBF
Nikita Kerren Riley-McDonald

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Friday, 26 April 2013, in both Hobart and Launceston to address a range of criminal and civil cases. In Hobart, Court 7 was scheduled to handle criminal proceedings, including mentions, pleas, and breach of bail applications. Launceston's Court 1 was set for similar criminal hearings, while Court 3 in Hobart was to proceed with civil matters. The civil docket in Hobart included amendments to statements of claim and discovery procedures, while Launceston’s criminal list involved sentencing and bail applications.

The legal issues before the court encompassed a variety of criminal and civil disputes. In the criminal cases, the court was tasked with managing preliminary proceedings, handling pleas, and addressing breaches of bail conditions. The civil cases primarily involved amendments to statements of claim and the process of discovery in litigation, which required the court to ensure procedural fairness and legal compliance.

The court's reasoning and outcomes were not detailed in the provided extract, but the nature of the cases suggests that procedural rulings, bail decisions, and amendments to legal documents were central to the court’s activities. The civil cases likely involved detailed consideration of the parties' rights and obligations under the law, while the criminal cases required the court to balance the interests of justice with the rights of the accused.

No specific final orders were detailed in the document, but it can be inferred that the court would have made decisions relevant to each case, including rulings on pleas, bail, and procedural amendments in civil matters.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established