Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 25 October 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 25 OCTOBER 2013

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Tu Ai Lin
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

9:45 a.m. (via video link from Launceston Court 1)
For Discharge
Lisa Anne Edmonds

10:00 a.m. (via video link from Launceston Court 1)
For Mention
MAT

4:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Mathew Stephen Henley

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.45am For Discharge by Video-Link to the Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Lisa Anne Edmonds

10.00am For Mention by Video-Link to the Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
MAT

For Bail Application (Part-Heard)
MSC

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:30 a.m.
For Trial (part-heard)
JWB

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a range of cases on Friday, 25 October 2013. Among these cases was that of Tu Ai Lin, who was part-heard in Court 1 in Hobart before Justice Tennent. The nature of Tu Ai Lin's case is not explicitly stated in the provided text, but it was scheduled for a trial under criminal jurisdiction.

The legal issues presented in this case are not detailed in the text, but typically, a trial in a criminal case involves determining the guilt or innocence of the accused based on the evidence presented. The court would have to decide whether the prosecution had met its burden of proving the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Issues such as the admissibility of evidence, the credibility of witnesses, and the interpretation of the law in relation to the alleged crime would have been central to the proceedings.

The reasoning and outcome of Tu Ai Lin's case are not provided in the text, but the court would have considered the evidence presented, legal arguments made by both the prosecution and the defence, and applicable laws and precedents. The outcome would depend on these factors, potentially resulting in a conviction, acquittal, or the continuation of the trial to a later date.

If further orders or sentences were made in the case, they would have been detailed in subsequent court records or announcements. The text does not provide information on any final orders made in this case.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established