Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 25 May 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 25 MAY 2012

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Variation
Peter Macuei Bona

For Trial
Bryan Peter Connolly
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Decision
Skilled Group Limited
v
Aubrey Barker

In Court
Costs Application
Mark Alexander Evans
v
Reginald Dawson
Not before 12:00 p.m.
In Court
For Application
Robert William Martin
v
Australian Securities and Investments Commission

In Court as in Chambers
For Directions Hearing
Kevin Charles Rothery
v
Alec Marr and anor

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Application
Emma Harrex
V
Alana Hall-King

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
2.15 p.m.
For Judgment via video link to Launceston
Brian William Nichol
V
Colleen Lane

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Chief Justice Crawford

Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
TJB
MAJ
Christopher John Humphreys
Skye James Leslie
Bradley Thomas Barrett
Dylan Maxwell Cocker
Thomas Jackson McGee
Gregory Charles Williams

For Plea
Stuart Gordon Shaw

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Wood
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00 a.m. For Trial (Part Heard)
Ryan Gregory Cecil Betts

11.00 a.m. For Mention
Peter William Leary

12.00 p.m. For Mention
Brett Douglas Scott

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Friday, 25 May 2012, with several cases listed across different divisions and locations. One of the cases, 'Skilled Group Limited v Aubrey Barker', was listed before Justice Tennant in the Civil Jurisdiction. The dispute involved a matter related to the Skilled Group Limited, a company, and Aubrey Barker, an individual. The nature of the dispute was not specified in the case summary, but it was scheduled for a decision hearing, indicating a resolution or ruling was expected.

The legal issues in this case likely pertained to the interpretation and application of relevant laws and precedents to the facts presented by both parties. Justice Tennant would have had to consider the evidence and arguments provided by both Skilled Group Limited and Aubrey Barker to determine the outcome of the case. The court's decision would hinge on whether the plaintiff's claims were substantiated by the evidence and whether the defendant's defences were valid.

In reaching the outcome, Justice Tennant would have meticulously reviewed the submissions, case law, and any other pertinent information. The decision would have been based on a thorough understanding of the legal principles applicable to the case and their application to the specific circumstances. The outcome of the case would have provided clarity and resolution to the dispute between Skilled Group Limited and Aubrey Barker.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established