SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 24 OCTOBER 2014
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30am
For Trial
Jamie Peter Smart
Rhys Louis Gardner
(Part-Heard)
10:00am
For Mention via Video-Link to Risdon Prison
Brent Anthony Cordwell
Darren Michael Dobson
For Mention
Nathan Grant Chatters
WRB
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Michael Anglin
Jassy Anglin
For Bail Consent
EJR
Daniel John Denny
Nicole Maree McGowan
Rodney Matthew Klye
RM
SSE
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Evidentiary Rulings
The Queen
v
Leah Lesley Cannon
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
9:30am
For Trial
Trent McSpadden
Natalie Jean Millhouse
(Part-Heard)
10:00am
For Mention
John Darren Rowbottom
Benjamin Michael Fama
George Maryon
Bail Consent
Jess Aaron Morgan
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15am via Video-Link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
COURT 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am for Mention by Video-Link
MCW
For Mention
Christina Vernessa Watson
Trent Phillip Tuthill
Joshua Aaron Wells
For Bail Application
Adam Maxwell Cox
Shaun Keverall Kaye
For Plea
Joshua Raymond Smith
BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 24 October 2014 [2014] TASSCCourtlist 226
- Case
- [2014] TASSCCourtlist 226
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court involved a range of criminal proceedings, including evidentiary rulings, bail applications, and pleas. The court had to determine the admissibility of evidence in the case against Leah Lesley Cannon, assess the eligibility for bail for several defendants, and consider the plea of Joshua Raymond Smith. The court was also required to address the preliminary proceedings application brought by Michael Anglin and Jassy Anglin.
The reasoning and outcome of these matters are not detailed in the document. The court's decisions would have been based on the evidence presented and the applicable laws and legal principles. The final orders, including any rulings on evidence, bail decisions, and pleas, would have been communicated to the parties involved in each case.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.