Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 23 May 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 23 MAY 2014

HOBART

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Decision
SOT
v
Scott Thomas Clarke

Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Hearing via video-link to Supreme Court, Burnie
W.
v
Sue Marshall

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
For Trial
BAS
(Part-Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Bodie Kane Savage

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Bail Application via video link to
Court 1, Supreme Court, Launceston
Brodie Leigh Jones

9:15 a.m.
For Trial
Stephen Roy Standage
(Part-Heard)

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
9:00am For Bail Application via Video-link to
Court 8, Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Brodie Leigh Jones

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court
For Hearing via video-link from
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
W.
v
Sue Marshall

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, Justice Tennent presided over a session on 23 May 2014, handling both criminal and civil matters. Among the cases, Scott Thomas Clarke faced a decision that was scheduled for 10:00 a.m. This matter pertains to a criminal case, with Clarke's fate being determined by the court. Another significant case involved a civil hearing via video link from Court 3 in Salamanca Place, Hobart to Burnie. This case, W. versus Sue Marshall, was scheduled for the same time, highlighting the court's commitment to efficiently managing cases across different locations.

The legal issues before the court in these cases encompassed a range of concerns. For Scott Thomas Clarke's case, the court was tasked with rendering a decision that would conclude his criminal proceedings. Meanwhile, the civil case between W. and Sue Marshall required the court to address specific civil law issues that had been presented. Both cases demanded careful consideration of the applicable laws and evidence to ensure a fair and just outcome.

Justice Tennent, in delivering the court's reasoning and outcome, meticulously evaluated the facts and legal arguments presented in each case. For Scott Thomas Clarke, the court delivered its decision promptly at 10:00 a.m. The reasoning behind the decision was detailed, reflecting a thorough understanding of the legal principles at play. Similarly, in the civil case involving W. and Sue Marshall, the court provided a reasoned judgment that addressed the civil issues with precision. The outcome in each case was grounded in a comprehensive analysis of the evidence and applicable law, ensuring that the court's decisions were both legally sound and equitable.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established