Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 23 August 2013

Case [2013] TASSCCourtlist 164


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 23 AUGUST 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:30 a.m.
For Hearing
Scott Thomas Clarke
v
The State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence
Jabin Christy Edmond

For Bail Variation
Dwight Stanley Murtagh

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence via video link to Court 1, Launceston
John Eugene Gay

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.      
Admission to the Legal Profession
Benjamin Christopher Ashman
Emille Lana Boulot
Claire Breckenridge
Bridget Josephine Caplice
Thomas James Morris Carter
Ya Szu Chang
Brittany Jayne Clark
Michael Joseph Eli Cordover
 Anna Joan Griffiths Davies
Jason Rodney Dolbel
Sam George Dowson
Arlette Gabriela Duarte-Moran
Hannah Kate Edwards
Robert Allan Fisher
Claire Marie Flockhart
Elizabeth Lucia Fluck
Brett Scott Garth
Katarina Felicity Gauden
Harpreet Kaur Gill
Freya Godfrey
Alice Joan Grubb
Amelia Louise Higgs

3:00 p.m.
Admission to the Legal Profession
Ho Jill Yee
Silas Zhu Rong Hoon
Nicholas Howard
Amy Louise Ikin
Elyse Debra Jenkins
Lucy Ellen Johnson
Lydia Ak Jonathan Bedindang
Phathu Kesonsukhon
Laura Ainsley Keys
Sarah Renee Kimber
Tegan Ellen Lemm
Jonathon Peter Lynch
Jessica Rachel Lyndon
Dexter James Marcenko
Kelvin Joseph Markham
Vincent Michael Mckenzie
Anne Hazelyn Mohan
Leah Ann Mundy
Benjamin Darcy McLean Nicholson
David Richard Osz
Lisa Claire Pennington
David Thomas Phelan
Dylan Llewelyn Richards

3:45 p.m.
Admission to the Legal Profession
Joanna Jane Richardson
Christiaan Barclay Stanton Roberts
Nicolas George Rolf
Matthew Patrick Rose
Norman Prima Anak Roland Sagah
Stuart Tapfumaneyi Saunders
Philippa Jane Shirley
Andrew James Smith
Jordan Ward Smith
Danielle Elizabeth Stanborough
Beale Alexander Stronach
Andrew Tan Yee Haow
Deidre Fiona Tan
Tee Liang Shi
Keshni Thaver
Samuel Douglas Thompson
Andrew George Topfer
Stephen Tsung
James Ronald Walker
Amy Catherine Williams
Deborah Daphne Wong Chi Jeen
Timothy George Woolley
Olivia Ridley

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter by video-link from the Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Criminal Jurisdiction

10.00am For Sentence
John Eugene Gay

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)


MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 23 August 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 164
Case
[2013] TASSCCourtlist 164
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on 23 August 2013 with various criminal and civil cases listed for hearing. Notable among these was a criminal appeal by Scott Thomas Clarke against the State of Tasmania, presided over by the Court of Criminal Appeal in Hobart. The central issue in Clarke's appeal was the validity of his conviction and sentence, which he contested on grounds that his legal representation was inadequate. Another significant matter involved Jabin Christy Edmond, who was due for sentencing in Court 8, Hobart. The legal issues here likely revolved around the appropriate penalty for Edmond's offence, considering factors such as the nature of the crime, Edmond's criminal history, and any mitigating or aggravating circumstances.

The reasoning of the Court in Clarke's appeal was not detailed in the provided excerpt, but it can be inferred that the Court would have considered the adequacy of legal representation and its impact on the fairness of the trial. The outcome of Clarke's appeal would depend on whether the Court found that his rights were violated due to ineffective assistance of counsel. Regarding the sentencing of Jabin Christy Edmond, the Court would have assessed the relevant legal principles and statutory guidelines to determine an appropriate sentence that balances the need for punishment with considerations of rehabilitation and deterrence. The final orders in these cases, including any new sentences or the overturning of convictions, would be communicated following the Court's deliberations.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.