SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 22 JUNE 2012
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Kurt Stanley James
Aaron James Crosswell
(Part- Heard)
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Shane John Hammond
(Part-Heard)
Not before 3.45 p.m.
For Sentence
Corey Wayne Bester
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court
10:00 a.m.
For Judgment
Cape Hood Pty Ltd and James Colin Collins
v
Garry Hall
11:00 a.m.
In Chambers
For Directions Hearing via Telephone
Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited
v
Robyn Joan Rourke
11:30 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Application
Stephen James Pearsall
v
Terence John Hasler
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via Video Link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business
11.00 a.m.
For Judgment
Jordan Robert Woods
V
James Robert Eaton
Amend Statement of Claim
Stanley Leslie & Jenifer Joan Wiggins
V
Portfolio Investments Pty Ltd
Amend Statement of Claim
Pasqualino Remo Taglieri
V
Portfolio Investments Pty Ltd & Anor
LAUNCESTON
No law list for Launceston
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 am
For Sentence
Michael Anthony Jones
For Mention
Tina Louise Jackson
Adrian Lloyd Reardon
For Plea
Tanya Maree Howard
Zannon Troy Howard
Kenneth Owen Reid
Elijah Joshua Bos
Leigh Adam Campbell
For Bail Consent
Darryl John Heard
Not before 12:00 noon
For Trial
HRRB (part heard)
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 22 June 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 112
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 112
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that came before the court included determining the outcome of a civil judgment in the case of Cape Hood Pty Ltd and James Colin Collins v Garry Hall, where the court was required to make a ruling based on the evidence and arguments presented. Furthermore, the directions hearing in Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited v Robyn Joan Rourke likely involved discussions on procedural steps and the management of the case. The video link case in Burnie would have addressed specific procedural or substantive issues pertinent to the amended statement of claim by Jordan Robert Woods against James Robert Eaton.
The court's reasoning and outcome were detailed in the judgment for Cape Hood Pty Ltd and James Colin Collins v Garry Hall, where Justice Evans provided a comprehensive analysis of the evidence and applicable law. The directions hearing for Tasmanian Perpetual Trustees Limited v Robyn Joan Rourke would have been guided by procedural rules and the specific needs of the case. For the video link case, Associate Justice Holt would have issued directions or decisions based on the amended claims and the legal principles involved. The final orders, including judgments and directions, were made in accordance with the court's findings and legal reasoning.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.