SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 22 APRIL 2016
HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Clinton Peter Raven
(Part Heard)
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Angela Maree Leahy
Justin Richard Maynard
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Directions Hearing via Video-Link
Stephen Roy Standage
v
State of Tasmania
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
11:30 a.m.
For Bail Application
Cameron James Riley
Mathew Parkinson
2:15 p.m.
For Directions Hearing via Video-Link
Susan Neill-Fraser
v
State of Tasmania
Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Leigh William Moses
Ryan Michael Zmendak
For Application to Review an Order Suspending Sentence
George Maryon
To Follow
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Application
Matthew James Moody
Jamie Alexander Penneyston
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Judgment via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Paul Francis Allison
v
Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and Ors
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45am
In Court as in Chambers
For Judgment via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Paul Francis Allison v Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and Ors
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Adam Maxwell Cox
BURNIE
No list for Burnie.
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 22 April 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 80
- Case
- [2016] TASSCCourtlist 80
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in the Standage matter involved the admissibility of evidence and the interpretation of certain provisions of the law. The court had to decide whether the evidence presented by the prosecution was sufficient to proceed with the trial and whether the defence's objections to certain evidence were valid. In the Allison case, the court had to determine whether the defendant had breached any contractual obligations and whether the plaintiff was entitled to the relief sought.
The court in the Standage matter found that the evidence was admissible and that the prosecution could proceed with the trial. The court rejected the defence's objections, finding that they were not supported by the law. In the Allison case, the court found that the defendant had breached the contract and awarded the plaintiff damages. The court also ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff's legal costs.
These decisions demonstrate the court's commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring that justice is served. The outcomes of these cases have significant implications for the parties involved and for the broader legal community.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.