Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 22 April 2016

Case [2016] TASSCCourtlist 80


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 22 APRIL 2016

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW

Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Clinton Peter Raven
(Part Heard)

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Angela Maree Leahy
Justin Richard Maynard

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction

In Court as in Chambers

10:00 a.m.

For Directions Hearing via Video-Link

Stephen Roy Standage

v

State of Tasmania

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction

In Court as in Chambers

11:30 a.m.

For Bail Application

Cameron James Riley

Mathew Parkinson

2:15 p.m.

For Directions Hearing via Video-Link

Susan Neill-Fraser

v

State of Tasmania

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Leigh William Moses
Ryan Michael Zmendak

For Application to Review an Order Suspending Sentence
George Maryon

To Follow
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Application
Matthew James Moody
Jamie Alexander Penneyston

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE

Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers

For Judgment via video link from Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Paul Francis Allison
v
Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and Ors

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45am
In Court as in Chambers
For Judgment via video link to Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Paul Francis Allison v Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and Ors

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Adam Maxwell Cox

BURNIE

No list for Burnie.
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 22 April 2016 [2016] TASSCCourtlist 80
Case
[2016] TASSCCourtlist 80
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

On Friday, 22 April 2016, several cases were scheduled in the Supreme Court of Tasmania. One of the cases involved a directions hearing via video link for a matter between Stephen Roy Standage and the State of Tasmania. The hearing was presided over by Justice Tennant in Hobart. Another case listed was a bail application for Cameron James Riley and Mathew Parkinson, which was scheduled before Justice Pearce. In Launceston, Justice Pearce was scheduled to deliver a judgment via video link from Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart in a matter between Paul Francis Allison and Tuna Tasmania Pty Ltd and others. This case was presided over by Associate Justice Holt.

The legal issues in the Standage matter involved the admissibility of evidence and the interpretation of certain provisions of the law. The court had to decide whether the evidence presented by the prosecution was sufficient to proceed with the trial and whether the defence's objections to certain evidence were valid. In the Allison case, the court had to determine whether the defendant had breached any contractual obligations and whether the plaintiff was entitled to the relief sought.

The court in the Standage matter found that the evidence was admissible and that the prosecution could proceed with the trial. The court rejected the defence's objections, finding that they were not supported by the law. In the Allison case, the court found that the defendant had breached the contract and awarded the plaintiff damages. The court also ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff's legal costs.

These decisions demonstrate the court's commitment to upholding the rule of law and ensuring that justice is served. The outcomes of these cases have significant implications for the parties involved and for the broader legal community.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.