Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 21 March 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 21 MARCH 2014

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Mention
Matthew John Davey
Zachary Jacob Jones

For Trial
Jamie Reginald Hall
Garry Scott Sullivan
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Lisa Maree Shelton
Mark Adam Johnson

Criminal Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Sean Andrew Wilkinson

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m.
In Court as In Chambers
For Decision
In the matter of the Will of the late Stanko Zulj
And in the matter of an application by Drago Zulj

In Court
For Decision

State of Tasmania
v
Andrew John Hammersley & Kellara Transport Pty Ltd & National Transport Insurance

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

10:30 a.m.
Leave to commence counterclaim/Transfer to Supreme Court
AMC Cleaning (Vic) Pty Ltd
v
Corporate Cleaning Services (Tas) Pty Ltd

2:15 p.m.
For Hearing
O’Hair
v
Amaca Pty Ltd & Ors

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Trial

Rhiannon Alleshia Harmon

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Chief Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial (part heard)
Elias Maffeking Kefalianos

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, on 21 March 2014, several cases were scheduled for hearing across different courts and jurisdictions. The cases varied from criminal to civil matters, reflecting the diverse responsibilities of the court. In the criminal jurisdiction, cases were scheduled for mention, plea, and trial, while civil jurisdiction cases were listed for decisions, hearings, and applications. The hearings were spread across Hobart, Launceston, and Burnie, indicating the court's commitment to providing justice across the state.

The legal issues in these cases encompassed a wide range, including wills and estates, insurance disputes, counterclaims, and contractual obligations. The court had to address the validity of wills, the interpretation of insurance policies, the admissibility of counterclaims, and the enforcement of contractual rights. These issues required careful consideration of legal principles, precedents, and the specific circumstances of each case.

The reasoning and outcome of each case would depend on the evidence presented, the arguments made by the parties, and the application of relevant laws and legal principles. The court's decisions would be based on a thorough analysis of the facts and the law, ensuring that justice is served in each matter. The final orders would reflect the court's determination on the issues presented, providing clarity and resolution to the parties involved.

In some cases, the final orders would include directions for further proceedings, such as trials or additional hearings, while in others, they would settle the disputes and provide a definitive resolution. The court's decisions would be communicated to the parties and recorded in the court's official records, serving as a legal precedent for future cases. The Supreme Court of Tasmania's role in resolving these diverse legal matters highlights its importance in the administration of justice in the state.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established