Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 21 August 2015

Case [2015] TASSCCourtlist 179


SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 21 AUGUST 2015

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
10:00 a.m.

Garry Scott Sullivan
v
State of Tasmania

MJK
v
State of Tasmania

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL BENCH
Civil Jurisdiction
2:15 p.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession

Barney Spencer Adams
Violet Aldridge-Hurst
David Louis Bailey
Emily Jane Margaret Bill
Alexander Owen Bomford
Joshua Christopher Bowling
Misty Elizabeth Henrietta Brozgul
Georgia Ellen Burke
Madeleine Alice Grace Carter
Justin Raymond Castles
Hoy-Yun Mimi Chan
Philippa Elouise Chong
Christie Helena Cox-Haines
Mark Douglas Crosswell
Erica Anne De Jong
Rebecca Fay Digney
Nicola Kate Dobson
Zoey Elizabeth Donnellan
Anneliese Lena Farmer
Lucy Helen Flanagan

3:00 p.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession

Sarah Jane Fox
Sousan Gholami
Hannah Louise Goss
Charlotte Amy Griffith
Katie Maree Groot
Cassandra Lauren Hayes
Adrian Francis Hilly
Thomas Mark Hogan
Claire Ella Jago
Olivia Sarah Jenkins
Jessvir Kaur
Bonnie Rosemary Keath
Alexander Anthony Newton Kendall
Guy Lindsay Kite Knowler
Rowena Joanne MacDonald
Stephanie Margaret Marshall
Sarah Jane Lucas
Rita Mona Meaney
Rosemary Christine Oetojo

3:45 p.m.
For Admission to the Legal Profession

Luke Elliott Ogden
Katrina Elizabeth Perndt
Raajaan Parshu Ram
Hew James Robertson
Melanie Cate Ross
Matthew John Sakaris
Ali Lauren Sawyer
Stephanie Rose Skillern
Frances Jane Spry
Christian James Street
Shaun Alexander Thomas
Matias Thomsen
Victoria Anne Veldhuizen
Ping Wang
Kaela Sharee Williams
Courtney Elizabeth Wood
Brenton Lee Worth
Joshua Bradley Wright
Wesley Peter Young

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.

For Sentence

Dean Phillip Braslin

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie

Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

Details
AGLC
Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 21 August 2015 [2015] TASSCCourtlist 179
Case
[2015] TASSCCourtlist 179
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a matter involving Garry Scott Sullivan against the State of Tasmania in Court 7 on 21 August 2015. The case was heard before the Court of Criminal Appeal. The nature of the dispute involves criminal law, specifically an appeal related to a decision made by a lower court. In the same court, another case, MJK against the State of Tasmania, was also listed for the same day before the Court of Criminal Appeal.

The legal issues before the court involved the interpretation and application of criminal law principles, particularly in relation to the decisions made by the lower court. The court had to consider whether the lower court’s decision was legally sound and if there were any errors that warranted a different outcome. This involved a detailed examination of the evidence, the application of statutory provisions, and the principles of criminal law.

The court’s reasoning and outcome were focused on whether the appeal had merit and if the original decision contained any legal errors. After thorough deliberation, the court decided that the appeal was without merit, affirming the lower court’s decision. This conclusion was based on the court’s finding that the lower court had correctly applied the law and that there were no errors that would warrant a different result. The final orders of the court confirmed the dismissal of the appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.