SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 19 OCTOBER 2012
HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10.00 a.m.
For Hearing
Alan Quarmby
v
Barrie Graeme Oakley
Alan Quarmby
v
Noel Geoffrey Harper
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice CRAWFORD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.45 a.m.
For Sentence
Christopher Leigh Burn
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.45 a.m.
For Sentence via Video-Link to Court 1, Supreme Court, Burnie
Kathryn Anne Woodberry
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
For Mention
Michael John Gardner
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice EVANS
Civil Jurisdiction
9.45 a.m.
For Judgment Via video link to Supreme Court 1 Launceston
West Tamar Council and Matthew Smith
v
Gary Leonard and the Integrity Commission
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
Discovery
Haroon & Anor
v
Lindisfarne (Health) Pharmacy Pty Ltd & Ors
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice Evans
Civil Jurisdiction
9.45am For Judgment by video-link from Court 3, Supreme Court, Salamanca Place, Hobart
West Tamar Council and Mathew Smith v. Gary Leonard and The Integrity Commission
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
9.45 a.m.
For Sentence via Video-Link from Court 8, Supreme Court, Hobart
Kathryn Anne Woodberry
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 19 October 2012 [2012] TASSCCourtlist 202
- Case
- [2012] TASSCCourtlist 202
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues central to these cases were primarily related to civil and criminal jurisdictions. For the Quarmby case, the court had to determine the validity of the claims made by Quarmby against Oakley and Harper. For the West Tamar Council case, the court needed to resolve issues surrounding the actions of Gary Leonard and the Integrity Commission, potentially involving matters of public accountability and integrity. Each case required a thorough examination of the evidence presented and the application of relevant legal principles.
The court's reasoning and outcome for the cases were not detailed in the summary, but the scheduled hearings suggest that each case would receive appropriate judicial attention. Associate Justice Holt was to preside over the West Tamar Council case, indicating a focus on the intricacies of civil law and administrative integrity. The hearings were scheduled to provide a platform for the parties to present their arguments and for the court to make informed decisions based on the evidence and legal arguments put forth.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.