Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 17 October 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 17 OCTOBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
For Trial
Jamie Peter Smart
Rhys Louis Gardner
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00a.m.
For Mention
Benjamin Michael Fama
Maxwell Douglas Morrison
Trysten Anthony Bennett

For Trial
Trent McSpadden
Natalie Jean Millhouse
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

10:30 a.m.
Directions Hearing
Wal’s Bulk Meats Pty Ltd and Ors
v
Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited

Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited
v
Wal’s Bulk Meats Pty Ltd and Ors

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00am For Disputed Facts Hearing
Cameron James Brasher

For Trial (Part-Heard)
Tristan Andrew Tuthill

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence
Jodie Helen Connelly

For Mention via video-link to Risdon Prison
Nathan Gregory Coppleman

For Preliminary Proceedings Application
John Anthony Evernett

For Plea
Anthony David Mitchell
Chad Leo Nightingale

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a variety of cases across its different divisions on 17 October 2014. In Court 7, before Justice Tennent, the part-heard trial of Jamie Peter Smart and Rhys Louis Gardner was listed for continuation. The nature of the dispute in this case was not specified in the document. In Court 8, before Justice Estcourt, the part-heard trial of Trent McSpadden and Natalie Jean Millhouse was also listed, with the mention of Benjamin Michael Fama, Maxwell Douglas Morrison, and Trysten Anthony Bennett also scheduled. Again, the specifics of the disputes were not outlined. In Court 3, before Associate Justice Holt, the directions hearing for Wal’s Bulk Meats Pty Ltd and others versus Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited and the reciprocal case were scheduled, indicating a complex commercial dispute involving banking and possibly loan agreements or defaults. The court also listed Launceston and Burnie for various criminal proceedings, including disputed facts hearings, pleas, and sentencing.

The legal issues before the Supreme Court of Tasmania required decisions on the progress and outcomes of ongoing criminal trials, as well as the direction and management of civil disputes. In the criminal cases, the court had to determine the evidence presented, the admissibility of certain testimonies, and the appropriate sentences for those found guilty. For the civil case, the court needed to provide direction on how the case would proceed, potentially addressing jurisdictional issues, discovery requests, and the exchange of evidence between parties. The legal issues involved in these cases required careful consideration of both procedural law and substantive law to ensure that the rights of the parties were protected and that the trials and hearings were conducted fairly.

The reasoning and outcome of the cases were not fully detailed in the document, as it only listed the cases for further proceedings. The Supreme Court of Tasmania would have addressed the specific legal issues as they arose during the hearings, applying relevant statutes and case law to the facts of each case. The outcomes would depend on the evidence presented and the arguments made by the parties. The court's decisions would be communicated in subsequent documents or judgments, which would provide detailed reasoning for the outcomes reached. The final orders, including any sentences imposed in the criminal cases and directions given in the civil case, would be recorded in the court's official records and potentially made available to the public, subject to any restrictions on publication.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established