Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 16 May 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 16 MAY 2014

HOBART

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Judgment
Joseph Reonal Gadon
v
The Police Review Board

Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Plea
John Frederick Singleton

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Stephen Garry George Devine
Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
BAS
(Part-Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
For Hearing via video-link from Court 1, Burnie
W.
v
Sue Marshall

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Plea
Stanley Martin Cash
Troy Mathew Furley

For Sentencing Submissions
JCS

BURNIE

Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Publication of Reasons
SOT
v
Shane Michael Foster

For Correction of Sentence
Leighton Allan Stokes

Civil Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
In Court
For Hearing via video-link to Court 3, Hobart
W.
v
Sue Marshall

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

The Supreme Court of Tasmania is set to hear two cases on Friday, 16 May 2014. The first case involves Joseph Reonal Gadon, who is suing the Police Review Board. The second case involves John Frederick Singleton, who is due to enter a plea. The court also has a criminal trial scheduled, involving two defendants, Stephen Garry George Devine and Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe. Another case, BAS, is also listed as part-heard. The court will also hear a miscellaneous civil case in Launceston, where Stanley Martin Cash and Troy Mathew Furley are due to enter a plea, and Leighton Allan Stokes is seeking correction of his sentence. The court will also hear a case in Burnie, where Shane Michael Foster is seeking publication of reasons. The court will also hear a case via video link, involving W. and Sue Marshall. The court is located at Salamanca Place, Hobart.

The legal issues in the case between Joseph Reonal Gadon and the Police Review Board are yet to be determined. The court will need to determine whether the Police Review Board breached any legal obligations owed to Gadon. In the case of John Frederick Singleton, the court will need to determine whether Singleton is guilty of the charges against him and what sentence should be imposed. In the case of Stephen Garry George Devine and Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe, the court will need to determine whether they are guilty of the charges against them and what sentence should be imposed. In the case of BAS, the court will need to determine whether the plaintiff is entitled to the relief sought. In the case of W. and Sue Marshall, the court will need to determine whether the defendant breached any legal obligations owed to the plaintiff.

The court's reasoning and outcome in each case will depend on the evidence presented and the applicable law. The court will need to carefully consider the facts of each case and apply the relevant legal principles to reach a decision. In the case of Joseph Reonal Gadon, the court may need to consider the Police Review Board's procedures and whether they complied with any relevant legislation. In the case of John Frederick Singleton, the court will need to consider the evidence against Singleton and determine whether it is sufficient to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt. In the case of Stephen Garry George Devine and Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe, the court will need to consider the evidence against them and determine whether it is sufficient to prove their guilt beyond reasonable doubt. In the case of BAS, the court will need to consider the evidence presented by both parties and determine whether the plaintiff is entitled to the relief sought. In the case of W. and Sue Marshall, the court will need to consider whether the defendant breached any legal obligations owed to the plaintiff.

The final orders in each case will depend on the court's decision. In the case of Joseph Reonal Gadon, the court may order the Police Review Board to pay damages to Gadon if it is found that they breached any legal obligations owed to him. In the case of John Frederick Singleton, the court may impose a sentence on Singleton if he is found guilty of the charges against him. In the case of Stephen Garry George Devine and Rachel Emma Sue Frankcombe, the court may impose a sentence on them if they are found guilty of the charges against them. In the case of BAS, the court may order the defendant to pay damages to the plaintiff if it is found that they breached any legal obligations owed to the plaintiff. In the case of W. and Sue Marshall, the court may order the defendant to pay damages to the plaintiff if it is found that they breached any legal obligations owed to the plaintiff.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established