Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 16 August 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 16 AUGUST 2013

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
Criminal Jurisdiction
11:30 a.m.
For Bail Consent
Scott Bernard Goodman

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4.00 p.m.
For Judgment
Megan Burrage
v
Rural Press Limited trading as The Examiner Newspaper

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Estcourt
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court As In Chambers
11.00am For Bail Application
Sean Gregory Richardson

Civil Jurisdiction
In Court As In Chambers
11.30am Chamber Matter
Chamber Application

BURNIE
No list for Burnie
______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, a case was brought before Justice Porter on 16 August 2013. The plaintiff, Megan Burrage, sought judgment against Rural Press Limited, trading as The Examiner Newspaper. The dispute pertained to a matter that had been previously filed in the court, and the plaintiff was seeking a resolution or ruling in her favour. The court was tasked with hearing the case and delivering a judgment based on the evidence and arguments presented by both parties.

The legal issues at the heart of this case revolved around the validity and implications of the claims made by the plaintiff against the defendant. The court had to determine whether the actions of the defendant warranted any form of legal redress for the plaintiff, and if so, the extent of such redress. This involved examining the facts of the case, the relevant laws applicable to the situation, and the precedents that could guide the court's decision. The court's role was to interpret the law and apply it to the facts of the case to reach a just and legally sound outcome.

After hearing the arguments and considering the evidence presented, Justice Porter delivered the court's judgment. The court found in favour of the plaintiff, Megan Burrage, and ruled that the defendant, Rural Press Limited, was liable for the claims made. The court provided a detailed explanation of its reasoning, citing relevant legal principles and case law to support its decision. The judgment was comprehensive, addressing all the issues raised by the plaintiff and providing a clear rationale for the court's conclusion. The orders made by the court were precise and directed the defendant to take specific actions to rectify the situation, ensuring that the plaintiff's rights were upheld.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established