Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 12 September 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 12 SEPTEMBER 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Trial
Jay John Bradford
Derek Michael Crosswell
David Ian Charles Coles
(Part-Heard)

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:45 a.m. via video-link to Risdon Prison
For Preliminary Proceedings Application
Jason Scott Picken

10:00 a.m.
For Mention
David William Michaelson
Trysten Anthony Bennett
Adam Savill

For Plea
Benjamin Michael Fama
Jason Linley Bell
Ethan Scott Cooper

For Facts and Sentence
Graham Charles Mitchell

Bail Consent
Nathan Robert Griffith

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
11:00 a.m.
In Court as in Chambers
For Hearing
Gaye Marguerite Sansom
v
Medical Board of Australia
(Part Heard)

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

12:00 p.m.
Leave to Issue Writ of execution
Bank of Queensland
v
LBCC Investments & Anor

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston at time of publication

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case involving multiple parties on the law lists for Friday, 12 September 2014. In Court 7, the case of Jay John Bradford, Derek Michael Crosswell, and David Ian Charles Coles was listed for trial, indicating a significant criminal proceeding was underway. Meanwhile, in Court 8, preliminary proceedings, pleas, and mentions were scheduled for several defendants, highlighting a range of ongoing criminal matters. Additionally, Court 1 featured a civil case where Gaye Marguerite Sansom contested a matter against the Medical Board of Australia, indicating a professional disciplinary or regulatory issue at stake.

The legal issues before the court encompassed a broad spectrum of criminal and civil matters, from trial proceedings in serious criminal cases to preliminary hearings, pleas, and sentencing. The civil case involved professional regulation, likely addressing issues of medical practice and professional conduct. The variety of cases reflected the court's role in handling both criminal prosecutions and civil disputes, as well as preliminary steps in the criminal justice process.

Justice Tennent presided over the criminal trial in Court 7, while Justice Escourt managed the criminal preliminary proceedings in Court 8. Chief Justice Blow handled the part-heard civil case in Court 1, and Associate Justice Holt managed miscellaneous civil business in Court 3 via video link. The court's handling of these diverse cases demonstrated its capacity to manage a broad range of legal issues, from serious criminal offences to professional disciplinary actions. The detailed scheduling and proceedings highlighted the court's structured approach to managing its caseload efficiently.

The final orders of the court would depend on the outcomes of the hearings and trials conducted on that day. The court's decisions would address the specific legal issues raised in each case, providing resolutions or next steps for the parties involved.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established