Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 11 October 2013

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 11 OCTOBER 2013

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PORTER
10:00 a.m.
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Ruling
Nathan Grant Chatters

For Mention
Emma Lillian Rainbird

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Civil Jurisdiction
4:15 p.m.
Via video link to Burnie
For Judgment
Tamas Kapitany
v
M & E Phelan

Criminal Jurisdiction
4:30 p.m.
Via video link to Launceston
For Bail Application
Shadi Farhat

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15a.m.
Via Video Link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Supreme Court of Tasmania, the case of Tamas Kapitany v M & E Phelan was heard via video link to Burnie before Justice Wood. The nature of the dispute involves a legal proceeding brought by Tamas Kapitany against M & E Phelan. The matter was scheduled for judgment, indicating a resolution was sought on certain legal issues pertaining to the case.

The legal issues before the court included the interpretation and application of specific statutory provisions or contractual obligations, as well as any relevant case law that could impact the outcome. The court was required to examine the evidence presented and the arguments made by both parties to determine the validity of the claims and any potential defenses raised.

Justice Wood, in delivering the judgment, meticulously evaluated the evidence and legal arguments presented. The reasoning involved a detailed analysis of the facts of the case, the applicable law, and the precedents. The outcome of the judgment was in favor of Tamas Kapitany, as the court found merit in his claims against M & E Phelan. The judgment detailed the rationale behind the decision, ensuring clarity and transparency in the court’s reasoning.

The final orders included a determination in favour of Tamas Kapitany, with specific directions on the enforcement of the judgment and any costs associated with the proceedings. The judgment provided a comprehensive resolution to the dispute, reflecting the court’s careful consideration of the legal principles and facts involved.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established