Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 11 July 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 11 JULY 2014

HOBART
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10:00 a.m.
For Application
Mickeal Bechara

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

12:00 p.m.
Directions Hearing
Colledge and Anor
v
Brooks Lark & Co Pty Ltd

LAUNCESTON

No list for Launceston

BURNIE
No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania heard a case involving Mickeal Bechara in the criminal jurisdiction. The specifics of the application are not detailed in the provided text, but it was scheduled to be heard in Court 1 at Salamanca Place in Hobart before Justice Porter. The hearing was set for 10:00 a.m. in chambers. This case likely involved a legal application or matter requiring judicial attention, with the proceedings taking place in a formal setting.

The legal issues before the court in this matter would have revolved around the application submitted by Mickeal Bechara. While the exact nature of the application is not specified, it may have involved a range of legal matters such as bail, sentencing, or other procedural issues within the criminal jurisdiction. The court's role was to review the application, consider relevant legal principles and precedents, and make a decision based on the evidence and arguments presented.

Justice Porter, overseeing the case, would have meticulously examined the application and any supporting documentation. The court's reasoning and outcome would have been guided by statutory provisions, case law, and the principles of justice. Ultimately, the decision would have been rendered based on a comprehensive analysis of the legal issues at hand, ensuring that the application was assessed fairly and in accordance with the law. The outcome of this case, while not detailed in the text, would have been communicated to the parties involved and potentially reported in legal databases for future reference.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established