Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 11 April 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 11 APRIL 2014

HOBART

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction

10:00 a.m.
For Plea
Terrence James Burn
Andrew William Barron
Justin Kevin Pearce

For Bail Application
Tarir Tot

2:15 p.m.
For Sentence
Ashley Gerard Dinnessen

Court 2, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice PEARCE
Civil Jurisdiction
In Court as in Chambers
10.00am
For Application
Parsons Bay Lodge Pty Ltd
v
Lynne Seddon

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON

Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston

Before Justice Porter
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am
For Bail Application (Part-Heard)
Jay David Blazely
Mitchell Clay Dowling

BURNIE

No list for Burnie

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened in various courts on Friday, 11 April 2014, addressing both criminal and civil matters. In Court 7, before Justice Wood, Terrence James Burn, Andrew William Barron, and Justin Kevin Pearce faced a plea hearing, while Tarir Tot had a bail application scheduled. Ashley Gerard Dinnessen was listed for sentencing in Court 2, also before Justice Wood. Associate Justice Holt presided over an application in Court 3, involving Parsons Bay Lodge Pty Ltd against Lynne Seddon. Launceston's Court 1, under Justice Porter, handled a part-heard bail application for Jay David Blazely and Mitchell Clay Dowling. No cases were listed for Burnie.

The legal issues encompassed in these cases ranged from pleas in criminal matters, bail applications, and sentencing to civil applications. In the criminal sphere, the court had to determine the defendants' pleas, assess the merits of bail applications, and decide appropriate sentences. In the civil realm, the court was tasked with resolving an application brought forth by Parsons Bay Lodge Pty Ltd against Lynne Seddon, focusing on the specific legal contentions between the parties.

The reasoning and outcomes for each case were determined by the presiding justices, who evaluated the evidence, arguments, and legal principles applicable to each matter. Justice Wood handled the plea and sentencing hearings, likely considering the nature of the charges, the defendants' backgrounds, and any mitigating or aggravating factors. Justice Holt presided over the civil application, focusing on the contractual or property issues at hand. Justice Porter addressed the bail application in Launceston, weighing the risk of flight, danger to the community, and the likelihood of reoffending. The outcomes would depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented in each case.

The final orders of the court were not detailed in the list, but they would have been communicated to the parties involved, outlining the court's decisions and any consequential directives or mandates.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established