Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 10 May 2012

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 11 MAY 2012

HOBART LIST
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the FULL COURT
10.00am
For Hearing
Terence David Howroyd
V
Richard John Howroyd
(Part-Heard)

Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before the COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
Not before 11.00am
Alison Christine Priest
V
State of Tasmania

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.15 a.m.
Via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11.00 a.m.
Set Aside Judgment
Jeffrey
V
Young

LAUNCESTON

No law list

BURNIE

No law list

_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

The Supreme Court of Tasmania convened on Friday, 11 May 2012, with several cases listed for hearing. One notable case was Terence David Howroyd versus Richard John Howroyd, which was part-heard before the Full Court. This case involved a dispute between two individuals, with the exact nature of their disagreement remaining unspecified in the excerpt. Another significant case was Alison Christine Priest versus the State of Tasmania, which was heard before the Court of Criminal Appeal. The specifics of the criminal allegations against the State of Tasmania were not detailed. Additionally, a miscellaneous civil case, Jeffrey versus Young, was scheduled for hearing via video link to Burnie.

The legal issues in these cases encompassed a broad spectrum of legal matters, ranging from family law disputes to criminal charges and civil litigation. The Terence David Howroyd versus Richard John Howroyd case likely involved interpreting family law statutes or precedents, while the Alison Christine Priest versus State of Tasmania case may have required the Court of Criminal Appeal to consider constitutional and criminal law principles. The Jeffrey versus Young case, being a miscellaneous civil matter, could involve contract law, tort law, or other civil disputes. The court's decisions in these cases would have significant implications for the parties involved and potentially set precedents for future cases.

The reasoning and outcome of these cases were not detailed in the excerpt. The court's decisions would have been based on the evidence presented, applicable laws, and legal precedents. For the Terence David Howroyd versus Richard John Howroyd case, the court would have considered the specific provisions of family law, the facts of the case, and relevant case law. Similarly, the Alison Christine Priest versus State of Tasmania case would have required the Court of Criminal Appeal to examine the evidence, the applicable criminal statutes, and any pertinent legal precedents. The Jeffrey versus Young case would have depended on the nature of the civil dispute, the evidence presented, and relevant civil law principles. The final orders would have been delivered following the court's deliberations and would have outlined the specific outcomes for each party.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established