Supreme Court of Tasmania Law Lists for Friday, 1 August 2014

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR FRIDAY, 1 AUGUST 2014

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Sentence
James Gregory Fletcher-Bryant

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
9:15 a.m.
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Stephen Roy Standage

2.00 p.m.
In Court as In Chambers
For Bail Application
Dwight Stanley Murtagh
JAD

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisidction
9:15 a.m. via video link to Burnie
Miscellaneous Civil Business

11:00 a.m.
Amend Pleadings/Set Down for Trial
Davis
v
Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority

LAUNCESTON
No list available at time of publication

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Justice Pearce
Criminal Jurisdiction

9.15 am
Criminal Jurisdiction
For Trial (Part-Heard)
Scott Thomas Clarke

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania published its law list for Friday, 1 August 2014, indicating a range of civil and criminal cases scheduled for that day. One of the notable cases was the sentencing of James Gregory Fletcher-Bryant, presided over by Justice WOOD in Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart. Another significant case involved Stephen Roy Standage, which was part-heard in Court 8, also in Hobart, before Justice ESTCOURT. This case was scheduled for both trial and bail application, reflecting the complexity and gravity of the charges against Standage.

The legal issues presented in these cases likely encompassed a variety of criminal proceedings, including sentencing considerations and trial assessments. The court's role was to ensure that all legal standards were met, and that justice was served in accordance with Tasmanian law. In the case of Davis v Port Arthur Historic Site Management Authority, the court was to address amendments to pleadings and set a date for the trial, indicating a focus on procedural fairness and the timely resolution of the dispute.

The court's reasoning and outcomes would depend on the specifics of each case, including evidence presented, legal arguments made by both parties, and the applicable laws. Justice WOOD and Justice ESTCOURT would have presided over their respective cases with an emphasis on ensuring that the legal processes were followed correctly and that the rights of all parties were protected. The final orders would reflect the court's decisions based on the evidence and arguments presented during the proceedings.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established