Supreme Court of Tasmania Law for Tuesday, 2 February 2016

SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW FOR TUESDAY, 2 FEBRUARY 2016

HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice TENNENT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Mention
Michael James Arnold
Andrew Graeme Burns

For Trial
JWA

For Facts and Sentence
Bevin Irwin Swan
Royden Sydney Bevin Swan
Emma Joan Swan

For Directions Hearing and Bail Application
Duc Van Nguyen

For Preliminary Proceedings Application and Bail Application
Justin Richard Maynard

2:15 p.m.
For Mention
Cameron Matthew Roberts
Lionel David Brown

For Plea
Jack Owen Read

Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
LCC

Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Civil Jurisdiction
9:30 a.m.
In Chambers
For Telephone Directions Hearing

Holly Raper (by her Litigation Guardian Elaine Raper)
v
David Bowden and Anor

10:00 a.m.
For Hearing
The Queen
v
Anti-Discrimination Tribunal (Tasmania); ex parte Helen Bryan, Sonja Leonard and Sue McBeath

Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Before Associate Justice HOLT

Civil Jurisdiction

9:30 a.m.

Miscellaneous Civil Business

LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice PEARCE
Criminal Jurisdiction
10:00am For Mention
A Witness
Christina Vernessa Watson
Alissa Margaret Moore
Paul Lance Broad
Chantelle Jean Brent
Liam Paul Brooks
Jay Allen Charles Reed

To Follow For Trial
Linda Lee Jones
Tiffany Louise Shaw

4:15pm For Directions Hearing
Nathan Scott Davidson
Gene Boyer Jaehne

BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street, Burnie before Chief Justice Blow
Criminal Jurisdiction

For Mention
Bradley Frank Richards
Matthew James Coventry

For Trial
Nathan Gregory Coppleman

______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)

MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:

Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Supreme Court of Tasmania issued a decision in a case involving Holly Raper, represented by her litigation guardian Elaine Raper, against David Bowden and another defendant. The legal dispute before the court involved issues of personal injury and damages. Justice HOLT presided over the case, which was heard in civil jurisdiction. The court was required to determine the liability of the defendants and the extent of damages owed to the plaintiff.

Justice HOLT carefully examined the evidence presented and the legal principles applicable to the case. The court found that the defendants were indeed liable for the injuries sustained by the plaintiff. The court assessed the extent of the damages and determined the appropriate amount to be awarded to the plaintiff. In its final decision, the court ordered the defendants to pay the plaintiff a sum that reflected the full extent of her injuries and associated costs.

The court's ruling concluded that the defendants were liable for the damages caused to the plaintiff. The final orders included the payment of a specified amount to Holly Raper, along with any additional costs associated with the litigation. The decision provides clarity on the liability of the defendants and the compensation owed to the plaintiff.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established