SUPREME COURT OF TASMANIA LAW LISTS FOR TUESDAY, 9 APRIL 2013
AMENDED LIST FOR HOBART
Court 7, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice WOOD
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Mention
Adam Paul Alexander
Allan William Jones
CLC
For Trial
Meaganne Glover
3.30 p.m.
For Application
Stuart Malcolm Allen
Court 8, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Justice ESTCOURT
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00 a.m.
For Trial
Jose Alberto Castaneda
Court 1, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Chief Justice BLOW
Civil Jurisdiction
10:00 a.m.
For Decision
Ivan Mercer
v
Allianz Australia Insurance Ltd
For Hearing
Retirement Benefits Fund Board
v
Geoffrey Frederick Elmore
Court 3, Salamanca Place, Hobart
Before Associate Justice HOLT
Civil Jurisdiction
9.30 a.m.
Miscellaneous Civil Business
LAUNCESTON
Court 1, Cameron Street, Launceston
Before Justice EVANS
Criminal Jurisdiction
10.00am For Mention
Clinton Michael Maher
Cameron James Riley
For Trial
Terence Williams
BURNIE
Court 1, Alexander Street Burnie before Justice Tennent
Criminal Jurisdiction
10 a.m.
For Mention
Shane Robert Smith
For Plea
Steven Dayle Johnston
For Hearing
Andrew Peter Morton
v
Loretta Ann Brooks
_______________________________________________________
(Note: Initials are used where publication of a person's name is not permitted by law.)
MAGISTRATES COURT LISTS available at:
Email subscriptions to the law lists of other courts can be requested at:
- AGLC
- Supreme Court of Tasmania Amended Law Lists for Tuesday, 9 April 2013 [2013] TASSCCourtlist 54
- Case
- [2013] TASSCCourtlist 54
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues in these cases span various domains, including criminal proceedings, civil litigation, and insurance disputes. For criminal cases, the court must consider the evidence presented, the admissibility of statements, and the application of criminal law to the facts. In civil matters, issues such as contractual obligations, insurance claims, and retirement fund entitlements are central. Each case requires careful examination of the relevant statutes, case law, and procedural rules to ensure a fair and lawful outcome.
The reasoning and outcome of these cases will depend on the specific facts and legal arguments presented. The court is tasked with interpreting the law, applying it to the facts, and reaching a decision that is just and equitable. The judges will consider submissions from both parties, review evidence, and apply judicial discretion where necessary. The final orders will reflect the court's determination of the issues based on the merits of each case. The Supreme Court of Tasmania's decisions will contribute to the development of legal principles and provide guidance for future cases.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.