Supreme Court (Chapter I Costs Court Amendment) Rules 2018 (Vic)
Supreme Court (Chapter I Costs Court Amendment) Rules 2018
S.R. No. 131/2018
TABLE OF PROVISIONS
Rule Page
1Object
2Authorising provisions
3Commencement
4Principal Rules
5Rules 63.56.1 to 63.57 revoked
6New Part 9 of Order 63 inserted
7Procedure on taxation
═════════════
Endnotes
STATUTORY RULES 2018
S.R. No. 131/2018
Supreme Court Act 1986
Supreme Court (Chapter I Costs Court Amendment) Rules 2018
The Judges of the Supreme Court make the following Rules:
1Object
The object of these Rules is to amend Chapter I of the Supreme Court Rules in relation to—
(a)reviews under sections 17H and 17HA of the Supreme Court Act 1986 of determinations made by costs registrars or by judicial registrars in the Costs Court;
(b)reconsideration by a judicial registrar in the Costs Court or by a Costs Judge of his or her own determinations; and
(c)appeals under section 17I of the Supreme Court Act 1986 to the Trial Division constituted by a Judge of the Court from determinations of the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge.
2Authorising provisions
These Rules are made under sections 17H, 17HA, 17I and 25 of the Supreme Court Act 1986 and all other enabling powers.
3Commencement
These Rules come into operation on 1 October 2018.
4Principal Rules
In these Rules, the Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015[1] are called the Principal Rules.
5Rules 63.56.1 to 63.57 revoked
Rules 63.56.1 to 63.57 of the Principal Rules are revoked.
6New Part 9 of Order 63 inserted
After Part 8 of Order 63 of the Principal Rules insert—
"Part 9—Review, reconsideration and appeal
63.90Interpretation
In this Part—
determination does not include—
(a)a referral for disciplinary action under section 3.4.46 of the Legal Profession Act 2004 as in force immediately before its repeal; or
(b)a referral for disciplinary action under section 202 of the Legal Profession Uniform Law (Victoria);
final determination means a determination that, subject only to any applicable right or power of review, reconsideration or appeal, is final, not interlocutory, preliminary or interim.
63.91Review under section 17H of the Act of costs registrar's determination
(1)An application by a party under section 17H(1) of the Act to the Costs Court constituted by a judicial registrar
for a review of a determination made by a costs registrar may only be made where—
(a)the determination—
(i)is a final determination; and
(ii)has been stated in the form of an order; or
(b)the costs registrar who made the determination or the Costs Court constituted by a judicial registrar or by a Costs Judge is satisfied that there are circumstances that warrant a dispensation from the requirements of paragraph (a) and, by order, grants leave to make the application for review accordingly.
(2)An application or proposed application for review under section 17H(1) of the Act shall be made by notice of application for review.
(3)Whether or not leave to make the application or proposed application for review is or was required or has been sought or granted, the notice of application for review shall be filed and a copy served on each party interested within 14 days of the making of the determination of the costs registrar.
(4)The notice of application for review shall—
(a)state the extent to which the determination of the costs registrar is objected to;
(b)state the grounds of the objection;
(c)state whether leave to make the application or proposed application for review is or was required under paragraph (1)(b) or otherwise;
(d)where leave was required and has been granted, give details of the order granting leave; and
(e)where leave is required and is to be sought from the Costs Court constituted by a judicial registrar, state the grounds relied on for a grant of leave.
(5)Without limiting paragraph (4), if the determination of the costs registrar is or includes a determination—
(a)allowing or disallowing, wholly or in part, any item in a bill; or
(b)allowing some amount in respect of any item—
and the party objects to such allowance or disallowance, the notice of application for review shall include—
(c)a list stating each item in the bill in respect of which the party objects to the allowance or disallowance; and
(d)a statement indicating specifically and concisely, item by item, the grounds of objection to the allowance or disallowance and the allowance or disallowance sought in its place.
(6)Where leave to make a proposed application for review is sought from the Costs Court constituted by a judicial registrar—
(a)the Costs Court constituted by a judicial registrar may, in its discretion, hear and determine the application for leave either in advance of or together with the proposed application for review;
(b)if it refuses leave, it shall, by order, make a determination dismissing the application for leave; and
(c)if it grants leave, then, unless it otherwise orders, the applicant is thereupon taken to have duly made an application for review under section 17H(1) of the Act in accordance with the filed notice of application for review and to have duly served a copy of the notice.
(7)To the extent that an application for review relates to a determination of a kind referred to in paragraph (5)(a) or (b) or relates only to the costs of a proceeding or matter which was heard and determined by the costs registrar—
(a)the review shall be a rehearing, not a review de novo;
(b)the determination may only be challenged for alleged error; and
(c)the same restrictions and principles apply to the review of the determination as would apply to a review of, or an appeal from, a like discretionary determination made by any taxing officer.
(8)Subject to paragraph (7), to the extent that a review under section 17H(1) of the Act relates to a determination of a kind referred to in paragraph (5)(a) or (b), the Costs Court constituted by a judicial registrar—
(a)shall review the taxation upon the objections stated;
(b)may, in its discretion, receive further evidence in respect of any objection;
(c)may confirm, set aside or vary the taxation; and
(d)may make such further or other determination as it considers necessary or appropriate.
(9)Except as provided by paragraphs (1), (4), (5), (6), (7) and (8), a review under section 17H(1) of the Act shall be a review de novo.
(10)The Costs Court constituted by the judicial registrar—
(a)shall state its final determination on the review in the form of an order; and
(b)may, and if required by any party within seven days after making its final determination on the review shall, give written reasons for its final determination.
(11)A review under section 17H(3) of the Act by the Costs Court constituted by a judicial registrar or by a Costs Judge, on the Costs Court's own motion, of a determination of a costs registrar, shall be commenced within 14 days after the making of the determination of the costs registrar.
(12)Where the Costs Court constituted by a judicial registrar or by a Costs Judge conducts a review under section 17H(3) of the Act, on its own motion, of a determination of a costs registrar, it—
(a)shall state its final determination on the review in the form of an order; and
(b)may, and if required by any party within seven days after making its final determination on the review shall, give written reasons for its final determination.
63.92Costs Judge may exercise powers under Rule 63.91
The Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge may exercise all the powers of the Costs Court constituted by a judicial registrar referred to in Rule 63.91 if—
(a)at any time there is no holder of the office of judicial registrar in the Costs Court;
(b)the judicial registrar is absent or for some other reason unable to perform the judicial registrar's duties; or
(c)for any other reason the Costs Court constituted by the Costs Judge considers that it is necessary or appropriate that a Costs Judge should exercise those powers.
63.93Reconsideration of judicial registrar's determination
(1)Any party interested who objects to a determination made by the Costs Court constituted by a judicial registrar, being a determination—
(a)that was made by the Costs Court constituted by the judicial registrar at first instance, and not on a review of a determination made by a costs registrar and not on a reconsideration under this Rule;
(b)that is a final determination; and
(c)that has been stated in the form of an order—
may apply to the Costs Court constituted by that judicial registrar for a reconsideration of the determination.
(2)An application under paragraph (1) shall be made by notice of application for reconsideration.
(3)The notice of application for reconsideration shall be filed and a copy served on each party interested within 14 days of the making of the determination of the Costs Court constituted by the judicial registrar.
(4)Without limiting paragraph (5), the notice of application for reconsideration shall state—
(a)the extent to which the determination of the Costs Court constituted by the judicial registrar is objected to; and
(b)the grounds of the objection.
(5)If the determination of the Costs Court constituted by the judicial registrar is or includes a determination—
(a)allowing or disallowing, wholly or in part, any item in a bill; or
(b)allowing some amount in respect of any item—
the notice of application for reconsideration shall include—
(c)a list stating each item in the bill in respect of which the party objects to the allowance or disallowance; and
(d)a statement indicating specifically and concisely, item by item, the grounds of objection to the allowance or disallowance and the allowance or disallowance sought in its place.
(6)To the extent that the determination under reconsideration is a determination of a kind referred to in paragraph (5)(a) or (b), the Costs Court constituted by the judicial registrar, upon the application for reconsideration—
(a)shall reconsider the taxation upon the objections stated in the notice of application for reconsideration;
(b)may, in its discretion, receive further evidence in respect of any objection;
(c)may confirm, set aside or vary the taxation; and
(d)may make such further or other determination as it considers necessary or appropriate.
(7)Except as provided by paragraphs (4), (5) and (6), the reconsideration shall be a de novo reconsideration.
(8)The Costs Court constituted by the judicial registrar—
(a)shall state its final determination on the reconsideration in the form of an order; and
(b)may, and if required by any party within seven days after making its final determination shall, give written reasons for its final determination.
63.94Review under section 17HA of the Act of judicial registrar's determination
(1)An application by a party under section 17HA(1) of the Act to the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge for a review of a determination made by a judicial registrar may only be made where—
(a)the determination—
(i)is a final determination; and
(ii)has been stated in the form of an order; or
(b)the judicial registrar who made the determination or a Costs Judge is satisfied that there are circumstances that warrant a dispensation from the requirements of paragraph (a) and, by order, grants leave to make the application for review accordingly.
(2)Subject to paragraphs (1), (3) and (4), an application to the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge for a review of a determination made by a judicial registrar may be made whether the determination was made—
(a)at first instance;
(b)on a reconsideration under Rule 63.93;
(c)on a review under section 17H(1) of the Act of a costs registrar's determination; or
(d)on a review under section 17H(3) of the Act by the Costs Court constituted by a judicial registrar, on its own motion, of a costs registrar's determination.
(3)Where a determination made by a judicial registrar (the original determination) is the subject of a pending application for reconsideration under Rule 63.93 or has been reconsidered under that Rule, the original determination shall not be made the subject of an application under section 17HA(1) of the Act to the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge for a review.
(4)Where a determination of a judicial registrar could have been made, but has not been made, the subject of an application for reconsideration under Rule 63.93, the determination shall not be made the subject of an application under section 17HA(1) of the Act to the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge for a review unless the judicial registrar who made the determination or the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge, by order, gives leave to make the application for review.
(5)An application or proposed application for review under section 17HA(1) of the Act shall be made by notice of application for review.
(6)Whether or not leave to make the application or proposed application for review is or was required or has been sought or granted, the notice of application for review shall be filed and a copy served on each party interested—
(a)within 14 days of the making of the determination of the judicial registrar; or
(b)where the judicial registrar has given written reasons for the determination or has been duly required pursuant to this Part to give such reasons, within 14 days of the giving of the written reasons.
(7)The notice of application for review shall—
(a)state the extent to which the determination of the judicial registrar is objected to;
(b)state the grounds of the objection;
(c)state whether leave to make the application or proposed application for review is or was required under paragraph (1)(b) or (4) or otherwise;
(d)where leave was required and has been granted, give details of the order granting leave; and
(e)where leave is required and is to be sought from the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge, state the grounds relied on for a grant of leave.
(8)Without limiting paragraph (7), if the determination of the judicial registrar is or includes a determination—
(a)allowing or disallowing, wholly or in part, any item in a bill;
(b)allowing some amount in respect of any item; or
(c)confirming, setting aside or varying any such allowance or disallowance—
the notice of application for review shall include—
(d)a list stating each item in the bill in respect of which the party objects to the determination; and
(e)a statement indicating specifically and concisely, item by item, the grounds of objection to the determination, and the determination sought in its place.
(9)Where leave to make a proposed application for review is sought from the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge—
(a)the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge may, in its discretion, hear and determine the application for leave either in advance of or together with the proposed application for a review;
(b)if it refuses leave, it shall, by order, make a determination dismissing the application for leave; and
(c)if it grants leave, then, unless it otherwise orders, the applicant is thereupon taken to have duly made an application for review under section 17HA(1) of the Act in accordance with the filed notice of application for review and to have duly served a copy of the notice.
(10)Unless the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge otherwise orders, to the extent that a review under section 17HA(1) of the Act relates to a determination of a kind referred to in paragraph (8)(a), (b) or (c)—
(a)further evidence in that regard shall not be received; and
(b)the applicant shall not raise any ground of review or objection not stated in the notice.
(11)A review under section 17HA(1) of the Act shall be a review in the nature of a rehearing, not a review de novo, and the determination of the judicial registrar may only be challenged for error.
(12)Subject to paragraphs (10), (11) and (13), on the review, the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge may—
(a)receive further evidence on questions of fact, whether by oral examination in court, by affidavit or by deposition taken before an examiner; and
(b)draw inferences of fact.
(13)To the extent that the review relates to a determination of a kind referred to in paragraph (8)(a), (b) or (c), or relates only to the costs of a proceeding or matter which was heard and determined by the judicial registrar, the same restrictions and principles apply to the review of the determination as would apply to a review of, or an appeal from, a like discretionary determination made by any taxing officer.
(14)Subject to paragraphs (1), (4), (8), (10), (11), (12) and (13), on the review, the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge may—
(a)exercise all the powers and discretions of the Costs Court with respect to the subject matter of the review;
(b)confirm, set aside or vary the determination of the judicial registrar;
(c)remit any objection to the Costs Court constituted by a judicial registrar or a costs registrar for determination or redetermination; and
(d)make such further or other determination as it considers necessary or appropriate.
(15)The Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge—
(a)shall state its final determination on the review in the form of an order; and
(b)may, and if required by any party within seven days after making its final determination on the review shall, give written reasons for its final determination.
(16)A review under section 17HA(3) of the Act by the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge, on its own motion, of a determination of a judicial registrar is to be commenced within 14 days after the making of the determination of the judicial registrar.
(17)Where the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge conducts a review under section 17H(3) of the Act, on its own motion, of a determination of a judicial registrar, it—
(a)shall state its final determination on the review in the form of an order; and
(b)may, and if required by any party interested within seven days after making its final determination shall, give written reasons for its final determination.
63.95Reconsideration of determinations of Costs Judge
(1)Any party interested who objects to a determination made by the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge, being a determination—
(a)that is made by the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge at first instance and not on a review of a determination made by a costs registrar or a judicial registrar and not on a reconsideration under this Rule;
(b)that is a final determination; and
(c)that has been stated in the form of an order—
may apply to the Costs Court constituted by that Costs Judge for a reconsideration of the determination.
(2)An application under paragraph (1) shall be made by notice of application for reconsideration.
(3)The notice of application for reconsideration shall be filed and a copy served on each party interested within 14 days of the making of the determination of the Costs Court constituted by the Costs Judge.
(4)Without limiting paragraph (5), the notice of application for reconsideration shall state—
(a)the extent to which the determination of the Costs Court constituted by the Costs Judge is objected to; and
(b)the grounds of the objection.
(5)If the determination of the Costs Court constituted by the Costs Judge is or includes a determination—
(a)allowing or disallowing, wholly or in part, any item in a bill; or
(b)allowing some amount in respect of any item—
the notice of application for reconsideration shall include—
(c)a list stating each item in the bill in respect of which the party objects to the allowance or disallowance; and
(d)a statement indicating specifically and concisely, item by item, the grounds of objection to the allowance or disallowance and the allowance or disallowance sought in its place.
(6)To the extent that the determination under reconsideration is a determination of a kind referred to in paragraph (5)(a) or (b), the Costs Court constituted by the Costs Judge, upon the application for reconsideration—
(a)shall reconsider the taxation upon the objections stated in the notice of application for reconsideration;
(b)may, in its discretion, receive further evidence in respect of any objection;
(c)may confirm, set aside or vary the taxation; and
(d)may make such further or other determination as it considers necessary or appropriate.
(7)Except as provided by paragraphs (4), (5) and (6), the reconsideration shall be a de novo reconsideration.
(8)The Costs Court constituted by the Costs Judge—
(a)shall state its final determination on the reconsideration in the form of an order; and
(b)may, and if required by any party interested within seven days after making its final determination on the reconsideration shall, give written reasons for its final determination.
63.96Appeals to the Trial Division
(1)An appeal under section 17I of the Act to the Trial Division constituted by a Judge of the Court from a determination of the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge may only be brought where—
(a)the determination of the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge—
(i)is a final determination; and
(ii)has been stated in the form of an order; or
(b)the Costs Judge who made the determination or the Trial Division constituted by a Judge of the Court is satisfied that there are circumstances that warrant a dispensation from the requirements of paragraph (a) and, by order, grants leave to appeal accordingly.
(2)Subject to paragraphs (1), (3) and (4), an appeal under section 17I of the Act from a determination of the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge may be brought whether the determination was made—
(a)at first instance;
(b)on a reconsideration under Rule 63.95;
(c)in a case where, under Rule 63.92, the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge has exercised the power of the Costs Court constituted by a judicial registrar to conduct a review, under section 17H(1) of the Act, of a determination of a costs registrar;
(d)on a review under section 17H(3) of the Act by the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge, on its own motion, of a costs registrar's determination;
(e)on a review under section 17HA(1) of the Act of a judicial registrar's determination; or
(f)on a review under section 17HA(3) of the Act, on the Cost Court's own motion, of a judicial registrar's determination.
(3)Where a determination of the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge (the original determination) is the subject of a pending application for reconsideration under Rule 63.95 or has been reconsidered under that Rule, the original determination shall not be made the subject of an appeal under section 17I of the Act.
(4)An appeal may not be brought under section 17I of the Act from a determination of the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge if the determination could have been made, but has not been made, the subject of an application for reconsideration under Rule 63.95, unless the Costs Court constituted by that Costs Judge or the Trial Division constituted by a Judge of the Court, by order, gives leave to appeal.
(5)For the avoidance of doubt—
(a)nothing in Rules 77.06 to 77.07 applies to an appeal under section 17I of the Act; and
(b)an appeal under section 17I of the Act shall be brought and conducted subject to and in accordance with this Rule and Rules 63.97 to 63.107.
63.97Appeal to be brought by notice of appeal
An appeal or proposed appeal under section 17I of the Act from a determination of the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge to the Trial Division constituted by a Judge of the Court is to be brought by notice of appeal.
63.98Time for notice of appeal
Whether or not leave to appeal is or was required or has been sought or granted, the notice of appeal shall be filed and a copy served on each party interested—
(a)within 14 days after the making of the determination of the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge; or
(b)where the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge has given written reasons for the determination or has been duly required pursuant to this Part to give such reasons, within 14 days of the giving of the written reasons.
63.99Contents of notice of appeal
(1)The notice of appeal shall—
(a)state the extent to which the determination of the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge is objected to;
(b)state the grounds of appeal;
(c)state whether leave to appeal is or was required under Rule 63.96(1)(b) or (4) or otherwise;
(d)where leave to appeal was required and has been granted, give details of the order granting leave; and
(e)where leave to appeal is required and is to be sought from the Trial Division constituted by a Judge of the Court, state the grounds relied on for a grant of leave.
(2)Without limiting paragraph (1), to the extent that the appeal or proposed appeal is from a determination—
(a)allowing or disallowing, wholly or in part, any item in a bill;
(b)allowing some amount in respect of any item; or
(c)confirming, setting aside or varying any such allowance or disallowance—
the notice of appeal shall include—
(d)a list stating each item in the bill in respect of which the appellant or proposed appellant objects to the determination; and
(e)a statement indicating specifically and concisely, item by item, the grounds of objection.
63.100Leave to appeal
Where leave to appeal under Rule 63.96(1) or (4) or otherwise is sought from the Trial Division constituted by a Judge of the Court, the Trial Division constituted by a Judge of the Court—
(a)may, in its discretion, hear and determine the application for leave to appeal either in advance of or together with the proposed appeal; and
(b)if it refuses leave, it shall, by order, dismiss the application for leave; and
(c)if it grants leave, then, unless it otherwise orders, the applicant is thereupon taken to have duly brought an appeal under section 17I of the Act in accordance with the filed notice of appeal and to have duly served a copy of the notice.
63.101Evidence and grounds in appeals against taxation
Unless the Trial Division constituted by a Judge of the Court otherwise orders, to the extent that an appeal under section 17I of the Act is from a determination of a kind referred to in Rule 63.99(2)(a), (b) or (c)—
(a)further evidence in that regard shall not be received; and
(b)the appellant or proposed appellant shall not raise any ground of appeal or objection not stated in the notice of appeal.
63.102Nature of appeal
(1)An appeal under section 17I of the Act shall be an appeal by way of rehearing, not an appeal de novo, and the determination of the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge may only be challenged for error.
(2)Subject to Rule 63.101 and paragraphs (1) and (3), on the appeal, the Trial Division constituted by a Judge of the Court may—
(a)receive further evidence on questions of fact, whether by oral examination in court, by affidavit or by deposition taken before an examiner; and
(b)draw inferences of fact.
(3)To the extent that the appeal relates to a determination of a kind referred to in Rule 63.99(2)(a), (b) or (c), or relates only to the costs of a proceeding or matter which was heard and determined by the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge, the same restrictions and principles apply to the appeal as would apply to the review of, or an appeal from, a like discretionary determination made by any taxing officer.
63.103Powers of the Trial Division
Subject to Rules 63.101 and 63.102, on the appeal, the Trial Division constituted by a Judge of the Court may—
(a)exercise all the powers and discretions of the Costs Court with respect to the subject matter of the appeal;
(b)confirm, set aside or vary the determination;
(c)remit any objection to any item in a bill to the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge or by a judicial registrar or by a costs registrar for determination or redetermination; and
(d)make such further or other determination as it considers necessary or appropriate.
63.104Stay
Except so far as the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge or the Trial Division constituted by a Judge of the Court otherwise orders, neither an appeal under section 17I of the Act nor an application for leave to appeal under that section shall operate as a stay of execution or of proceedings under any determination of the Costs Court to which the appeal or application for leave to appeal relates.
63.105Cross-appeal
(1)Subject to Rule 63.106, a respondent to an appeal under section 17I of the Act or to an application for leave to appeal under that section who desires to appeal or to seek leave to appeal from the determination in question shall do so by—
(a)filing a notice of cross-appeal; and
(b)serving on the appellant or proposed appellant a copy of the notice of cross-appeal—
within 14 days of the service on the respondent of the notice of appeal.
(2)Rules 63.99, 63.100, 63.101, 63.102, 63.103 and 63.104 apply in relation to a cross-appeal or an application for leave to cross-appeal as if it were an appeal or an application for leave to appeal, as the case may be.
63.106Notice of contention
If a respondent to an appeal under section 17I of the Act or a respondent to an application for leave to appeal under that section does not seek to have the determination actually made by the Costs Court constituted by a Costs Judge set aside or varied, but proposes to contend that it should be affirmed on a ground, whether of fact or law, which—
(a)was not decided;
(b)was erroneously decided; or
(c)was not raised for decision before the Costs Court—
the respondent, not less than 14 days before the day fixed for the hearing of the appeal or the application for leave to appeal (as the case may be) shall file and serve a notice of contention, stating the grounds to be relied on.
63.107Transitional for Part 9
(1)This Part only applies to determinations made in proceedings commenced in the Costs Court after the commencement of this Part.
(2)Rules 63.56.1 to 63.57 (as in force immediately before the commencement of this Part) continue to apply to determinations made in proceedings commenced in the Costs Court before the commencement of this Part (including determinations made on reconsideration or review in such proceedings) as if those Rules had not been revoked.".
7Procedure on taxation
For Rule 63.63(2) of the Principal Rules substitute—
"(2)Part 9 applies, in accordance with its tenor, to the taxation of costs under this Part.".
Dated: 12 September 2018
ANNE FERGUSON, C.J.
PAMELA TATE, J.A.
SIMON P. WHELAN, J.A.
DAVID F. R. BEACH, J.A.
EMILIOS KYROU, J.A.
STEPHEN KAYE, J.A.
S. G. E. McLEISH, J.A.
R. NIALL, J.A.
KIM HARGRAVE, J.A.
KARIN EMERTON, J. A.
ELIZABETH HOLLINGWORTH, J.
ANTHONY CAVANOUGH, J.
CLYDE CROFT, J.
M. L. SIFRIS, J.
PETER ALMOND, J.
JOHN R. DIXON, J.
C. MACAULAY, J.
KATE McMILLAN, J.
GREG GARDE, J.
G. J. DIGBY, J.
JAMES D. ELLIOTT, J.
T. J. GINNANE, J.
MELANIE SLOSS, J.
M. J. CROUCHER, J.
JOANNE CAMERON, J.
CHRISTOPHER W. BEALE, J.
MICHAEL McDONALD, J.
RITA ZAMMIT, J.
P. J. RIORDAN, J.
A. J. KEOGH, J.
MICHELLE QUIGLEY, J.
J. R. CHAMPION, J.
M. N. CONNOCK, J
MELINDA RICHARDS, J
KEVIN J. A. LYONS, J.
LESLEY TAYLOR, J.
S. J. MOORE, J.
ANDREW J. TINNEY, J.
═════════════
Endnotes
[1]
Rule 4: S.R. No. 103/2015. Reprint No. 2 as at 2 January 2018.
Reprinted to S.R. No. 127/2017. Subsequently amended by
S.R. Nos 32/2018, 33/2018 and 58/2018.
0
0
0