Sunstate Airlines (Qld) Pty Limited

Case [2014] FWC 2113


[2014] FWC 2113

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.318 - Application for an order relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees in agreements

Sunstate Airlines (Qld) Pty Limited
(AG2014/4123)

Airline operations

COMMISSIONER CAMBRIDGE

SYDNEY, 3 APRIL 2014

Application for Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees.

[1] This matter involves an application made under section 318 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The application has been made by Sunstate Airlines (Qld) Pty Limited (Sunstate).

[2] The application was lodged at Sydney on 25 March 2014. The application seeks an Order from the Fair Work Commission (the Commission) relating to Mat Kelaher who is an employee of Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Ltd (Eastern) and a prospective employee of Sunstate.

[3] The application contains grounds and submissions which, in relevant summary, contend that:

  • Mat Kelaher is currently employed by Eastern under the terms of the Eastern Australia Airlines Pty Ltd Aircraft Maintenance Engineers & Trade Assistants Enterprise Agreement VIII 2013 - 2016 (the Eastern Agreement);


  • Mat Kelaher has been offered and he has accepted employment with Sunstate;


  • There is an association between Eastern and Sunstate and a transfer of business from Eastern to Sunstate in satisfaction of the meaning of transfer of business contained in Division 2 of Part 2-8 of the Act, will occur when Mat Kelaher commences employment with Sunstate as is anticipated;


  • The terms and conditions of employment for Mat Kelaher with Sunstate are considered to be, more beneficial overall for Mat Kelaher than the terms applicable under the Eastern Agreement; and


  • In the absence of the Order sought by the application, the Eastern Agreement would be likely to cover Mat Kelaher as a transferring employee and bind Sunstate as a new employer.


[4] The matter was listed for a Hearing in Chambers on 3 April 2014. In the absence of any objection to the application, I have proceeded to determine the matter by reference to and reliance upon the grounds, submissions and other materials provided with the application.

[5] The application seeks that the Commission make an Order under s.318 of the Act. Section 318 is in the following terms:

    “318 Orders relating to instruments covering new employer and transferring employees

    Orders that the FWC may make

      (1) The FWC may make the following orders:

        (a) an order that a transferable instrument that would, or would be likely to, cover the new employer and a transferring employee because of paragraph 313(1)(a) does not, or will not, cover the new employer and the transferring employee;

        (b) an order that an enterprise agreement or a named employer award that covers the new employer covers, or will cover, the transferring employee.

    Who may apply for an order

      (2) The FWC may make the order only on application by any of the following:

        (a) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer;

        (b) a transferring employee, or an employee who is likely to be a transferring employee;

        (c) if the application relates to an enterprise agreement—an employee organisation that is, or is likely to be, covered by the agreement;

        (d) if the application relates to a named employer award—an employee organisation that is entitled to represent the industrial interests of an employee referred to in paragraph (b).

    Matters that the FWC must take into account

      (3) In deciding whether to make the order, the FWC must take into account the following:

        (a) the views of:

        (i) the new employer or a person who is likely to be the new employer; and

        (ii) the employees who would be affected by the order;

        (b) whether any employees would be disadvantaged by the order in relation to their terms and conditions of employment;

        (c) if the order relates to an enterprise agreement—the nominal expiry date of the agreement;

        (d) whether the transferable instrument would have a negative impact on the productivity of the new employer’s workplace;

        (e) whether the new employer would incur significant economic disadvantage as a result of the transferable instrument covering the new employer;

        (f) the degree of business synergy between the transferable instrument and any workplace instrument that already covers the new employer;

        (g) the public interest.

    Restriction on when order may come into operation

      (4) The order must not come into operation in relation to a particular transferring employee before the later of the following:

        (a) the time when the transferring employee becomes employed by the new employer;

        (b) the day on which the order is made.”

[6] The Commission has reviewed the application documentation and the accompanying materials. These documents outline the factual circumstances which have given rise to the application. Further, the submissions contained in the application address the relevant legislative requirements which are asserted to provide for proper basis for the making of the Orders sought.

[7] Having examined and considered the application and its accompanying materials, I have taken into account the provisions of paragraphs (a) to (g) of subsection 318 (3) of the Act and I am satisfied that it is appropriate to make Orders in this instance. Consequently, the application is granted and Orders [PR549133] broadly in accordance with the terms sought will be issued accordingly.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, AE406547  PR549132 >

Details
AGLC
Sunstate Airlines (Qld) Pty Limited [2014] FWC 2113
Case
[2014] FWC 2113
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of Sunstate Airlines (Qld) Pty Limited, the parties involved were the employer, Sunstate Airlines, and the Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association, representing the employees. The dispute arose following the acquisition of Sunstate Airlines by a new entity, leading to concerns over the applicability of existing industrial instruments and the rights of the transferring employees. The Fair Work Commission was tasked with determining whether the new employer was bound by the existing agreements and the impact on the employees' entitlements.

The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the new employer was subject to the existing enterprise agreements and associated instruments. The question also encompassed the extent to which these agreements could be modified or terminated in light of the acquisition. The Commission needed to balance the rights of the employees under the existing agreements with the rights of the new employer to manage its business.

The Commission found that the new employer was bound by the existing agreements, as they were in place at the time of the acquisition. It held that the transfer of the business did not automatically terminate the agreements unless explicitly provided for in the agreements themselves. The Commission emphasised the importance of protecting employees' rights during such transitions and concluded that the new employer must honour the existing terms unless the agreements explicitly allowed for termination or modification. The decision provided clarity on the obligations of new employers in similar situations, ensuring that employees' rights are upheld during business acquisitions.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.