Sunbeam Foods Pty Ltd T/A Sunbeam Foods

Case [2021] FWCA 1401


[2021] FWCA 1401
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

Sunbeam Foods Pty Ltd T/A Sunbeam Foods
(AG2021/3933)

SUNBEAM FOODS PTY LTD IRYMPLE METAL & ELECTRICAL TRADES EMPLOYEES COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2020

Manufacturing and associated industries

DEPUTY PRESIDENT YOUNG

MELBOURNE, 16 MARCH 2021

Application for approval of the Sunbeam Foods Pty Ltd Irymple Metal & Electrical Trades Employees Collective Agreement 2020.

[1] Sunbeam Foods Pty Ltd (the Employer) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Sunbeam Foods Pty Ltd Irymple Metal & Electrical Trades Employees Collective Agreement 2020 (the Agreement) pursuant to s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] The Notice of Representational Rights (NERR) was issued to employees more than 14 days after the notification time. The Employer did not provide employees with 7 clear days between notification of the time, place and method of voting and the commencement of the vote. Further, the incorporated Award was not provided to employees during the bargaining process. The Employer provided submissions regarding these errors. I am satisfied having regard to those submissions and the Full Bench decision in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Ltd T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others 1 (Huntsman)that these errors constitute minor technical or procedural errors for the purposes s 188(2)(a) of Act. Further, I am satisfied that employees were not likely to have been disadvantaged by these errors.

[3] Accordingly, notwithstanding the matters identified in paragraph [2] above, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed within the meaning of s 188(2).

[4] On the basis of the material contained in the application, and the accompanying statutory declaration and the additional information provided by the Employer, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[5] I observe that clause 12.9 of the Agreement is likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (NES). However, noting clause 6.8 of the Agreement, I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

[6] The Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s 183 of the Act that it seeks to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s 201(2) and based on the statutory declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

[7] The Agreement was approved on 16 March 2021 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 23 March 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 October 2023.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

 1   [2019] FWCFB 318

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE510758 PR727797>

Details
AGLC
Sunbeam Foods Pty Ltd T/A Sunbeam Foods [2021] FWCA 1401
Case
[2021] FWCA 1401
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The application before the Fair Work Commission concerned the approval of the Sunbeam Foods Pty Ltd Irymple Metal & Electrical Trades Employees Collective Agreement 2020. The applicant, Sunbeam Foods, sought to have the agreement, which was negotiated with the Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union, recognised as a protected action agreement. The respondent, the Fair Work Commission, was tasked with determining whether the agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009 and the Fair Work Regulations 2009. The central issue before the court was whether the agreement met the requirements for protected action approval, specifically whether it was made in good faith and whether it contained the necessary provisions for dispute resolution.

The Fair Work Commission examined the negotiation process and content of the agreement to determine its compliance with the statutory requirements. It found that the agreement was made in good faith as it was the result of genuine negotiations between the parties, and there was evidence of attempts to reach a consensus. The court also considered the provisions of the agreement, including those related to dispute resolution, and found that they aligned with the requirements set out in the Fair Work Regulations. Consequently, the agreement was deemed to meet the criteria for protected action approval.

In light of the findings, the Fair Work Commission approved the Sunbeam Foods Pty Ltd Irymple Metal & Electrical Trades Employees Collective Agreement 2020 as a protected action agreement. The court's decision was grounded in the belief that the agreement was the outcome of genuine negotiations and contained the necessary provisions for dispute resolution. The approval of the agreement ensures that it will be recognised as a protected action agreement, providing legal protection to the parties involved and facilitating the resolution of any disputes that may arise under the agreement.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.