Sullivan v Tyler

[2016] HCASL 316

SULLIVAN

v

TYLER & ANOR

[2016] HCASL 316
S167/2016

1. The applicant requires an extension of time, but it would be futile to grant the extension which is sought.  The applicant has not identified a question of law sufficient to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal and otherwise advances no arguable ground of appeal against the decision of the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia (Thackray, Strickland and Austin JJ).  Special leave should be refused.  The applicant's summons filed on 13 September 2016 seeking leave to amend her draft notice of appeal and written case should be dismissed.

2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.

G.A.A. Nettle
7 December 2016 M.M. Gordon