| [2022] FWCA 1557 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Suez Water Pty Ltd T/A Suez Water Pty Ltd – Asd P&T Alliance
(AG2022/1226)
Suez Water Pty Ltd Adelaide Service Delivery Production and Treatment Electrical Trades Enterprise Agreement 2021 – 2024
| Water, sewerage and drainage services | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT SAUNDERS | NEWCASTLE, 11 MAY 2022 |
Application for approval of the Suez Water Pty Ltd Adelaide Service Delivery Production and Treatment Electrical Trades Enterprise Agreement 2021-2024
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Suez Water Pty Ltd Adelaide Service Delivery Production and Treatment Electrical Trades Enterprise Agreement 2021-2024 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to section 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
The statutory declaration (Form F17) filed with the application states that the employees were provided with voting information on 6 April 2022 and that the vote was held on 13 April 2022. In these circumstances, the employees did not receive 7 clear days’ notice of the time, place and method of the vote as required by s 180(2) of the Act. The Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia (CEPU) was involved with bargaining and all 24 employees covered by the Agreement cast a valid vote, the vast majority of whom voted to approve the Agreement. On review of the application, this issue was raised with the Applicant who provided submissions that this constituted a minor procedural or technical error for the purposes of paragraph 188(2)(a) of the Act and that this did not impact on the employees ability to consider the Agreement prior to the vote. This response was provided to the CEPU and it was given an opportunity to provide a response. The CEPU did not provide a response. Nevertheless, in the circumstances, I am satisfied that having regard to the decision of the Full Bench in Huntsman Chemical Company Australia Pty Limited T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others,[1] this constitutes a minor procedural error for the purposes of paragraph 188(2)(a) of the Act. Further, having regard to the content of the declaration I am satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the error. As a result, I am satisfied that the Agreement has been genuinely agreed within the meaning of subsection 188(2) of the Act.
The Applicant has provided written undertakings (Undertakings). A copy of the Undertakings is attached in Annexure A to this decision. I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:
(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or
(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
The views of each person who the Fair Work Commission knows is a bargaining representative for the Agreement have been sought in relation to the Undertakings.
Pursuant to subsection 190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings. The Undertakings are taken to be a term of the Agreement.
Subject to the Undertakings, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187, 188 and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The CEPU, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under section 183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with subsection 201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with section 54 of the Act, will operate from 18 May 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 1 September 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Annexure A
[1] [2019] FWCFB 318
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE515918 PR741448>
- AGLC
- Suez Water Pty Ltd T/A Suez Water Pty Ltd – Asd P&T Alliance [2022] FWCA 1557
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 1557
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. This included ensuring that the agreement met the requirements for 'agreement' under the Act, which mandates that the agreement must be in writing, cover a 'designated group' of employees, and be approved by a majority of the relevant employees. Additionally, the Commission considered whether the agreement adequately balanced the interests of both the employer and employees, in line with the objectives of the Act.
The Commission found that the proposed agreement satisfied all necessary statutory requirements. It was in writing, applied to a designated group of employees, and had been approved by a majority of the relevant employees. The Commission also noted that the agreement contained provisions that addressed the reasonable needs of the employer while also considering the interests of the employees. Given that the agreement met all legislative criteria and provided a fair balance between the parties, the Commission approved the agreement. This decision ensures that the terms and conditions of employment for the electrical trades workers in the Adelaide region are governed by this agreement for the specified period.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.