| [2019] FWCA 6736 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
SUEZ Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd T/A Suez Recycling & Recovery
(AG2019/3573)
SUEZ CENTRAL COAST & HUNTER COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL COLLECTIONS AGREEMENT 2019
Waste management industry | |
COMMISSIONER JOHNS | SYDNEY, 30 SEPTEMBER 2019 |
Application for approval of the SUEZ Central Coast & Hunter Commercial and Industrial Collections Agreement 2019.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the SUEZ Central Coast & Hunter Commercial and Industrial Collections Agreement 2019 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). It has been made by SUEZ Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd T/A Suez Recycling & Recovery. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia (TWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 October 2019. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2020.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE505498 PR712866>
- AGLC
- SUEZ Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd T/A Suez Recycling & Recovery [2019] FWCA 6736
- Case
- [2019] FWCA 6736
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the proposed agreement met the necessary statutory criteria and regulatory standards. This involved examining the agreement's provisions in relation to waste management practices, environmental protection measures, and compliance with relevant legislation. The court also had to assess whether the agreement provided adequate protections for the environment and public health, and whether it aligned with broader waste management policies and objectives.
In delivering its decision, the court meticulously reviewed the proposed agreement against the statutory requirements and regulatory frameworks. The court found that the agreement, as presented, contained several deficiencies that needed to be addressed to ensure compliance with environmental standards. Despite these shortcomings, the court concluded that the applicant had demonstrated a commitment to improving the agreement and was willing to make necessary amendments. Consequently, the court granted conditional approval for the agreement, subject to the implementation of specific changes and additional safeguards. These conditions were intended to ensure that the agreement would meet the required standards upon its finalisation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.