| [2021] FWCA 2932 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Suez Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd
(AG2021/5007)
SUEZ MEDICAL SOLUTIONS AGREEMENT 2020
Waste management industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BEAUMONT | PERTH, 26 MAY 2021 |
Application for approval of the SUEZ Medical Solutions Agreement 2020.
[1] Suez Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd has made an application for the approval of an enterprise agreement known as the SUEZ Medical Solutions Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made under s 185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Applicant has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached in Annexure A. I am satisfied that the undertakings will not cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement and that the undertakings will not result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] In compliance with s 190(4) of the Act, the bargaining representative’s views regarding the undertakings proffered were sought. They were provided with the opportunity to raise and address any objections they had to the undertakings proffered by the Applicant. No objection was raised.
[4] Subject to the undertakings referred to above, and on the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declarations, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss 186, 187, 188, and 190 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[5] The Agreement was approved on 26 May 2021 and, in accordance with s 54, will operate from 2 June 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 December 2023.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE511629 PR730060>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Suez Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 2932
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 2932
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court meticulously examined the agreement to determine if it met the necessary legislative standards. It considered the environmental impact assessments, the mechanisms for monitoring compliance, and the provisions for reporting and transparency. The court also assessed whether the agreement sufficiently addressed the risks associated with medical waste disposal, including the potential for cross-contamination and the impact on public health. Furthermore, the court evaluated the agreement's alignment with broader waste management policies and its contribution to the goals of waste minimisation and resource recovery.
In its decision, the court found that the SUEZ Medical Solutions Agreement 2020 was in the public interest and met the legislative requirements. The court noted the comprehensive measures included in the agreement for managing and disposing of medical waste, including stringent protocols for handling, transportation, and disposal. The court also acknowledged the robust framework for oversight and accountability, which it deemed sufficient to mitigate environmental and health risks. The agreement was approved on the basis that it provided a clear and effective pathway for the responsible management of medical waste in compliance with environmental and public health standards.
The court's approval of the agreement was contingent upon the implementation of specific conditions aimed at enhancing environmental protection and public health. These conditions included the establishment of a monitoring and reporting regime to ensure ongoing compliance with the agreement's terms. Additionally, the court mandated the development of a community engagement strategy to maintain transparency and address any public concerns related to medical waste disposal. The final orders required the parties to adhere to these conditions and to report back to the court on the implementation and effectiveness of the agreement within specified timelines.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.