| [2021] FWCA 6327 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Suez Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd
(AG2021/7602)
SUEZ SAWT AGREEMENT 2021
Waste management industry | |
COMMISSIONER MATHESON | SYDNEY, 18 OCTOBER 2021 |
Application for approval of the SUEZ SAWT Agreement 2021.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the SUEZ SAWT Agreement 2021 (Agreement). The application was made by SUEZ Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd (Applicant) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The Employer has provided written undertakings. A copy of the undertakings is attached at Annexure A of this decision (Undertakings). I am satisfied that the effect of accepting the Undertakings is not likely to:
(a) cause financial detriment to any employee covered by the Agreement; or
(b) result in substantial changes to the Agreement.
[3] Pursuant to s.190(3) of the Act, I accept the Undertakings.
[4] Subject to the Undertakings, and on the basis of the materials before the Commission, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act as are relevant to the application for approval of the Agreement have been met.
[5] The Transport Workers’ Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[6] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 October 2021. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2024.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
< AE513565 PR735018>
Annexure A
- AGLC
- Suez Recycling & Recovery Pty Ltd [2021] FWCA 6327
- Case
- [2021] FWCA 6327
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issues before the Court were whether the agreement was a genuinely negotiated one and if it adhered to the requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Court had to determine whether the agreement contained the mandatory terms prescribed by the Act and if it was free from any provisions that could potentially undermine the rights or entitlements of the employees. Furthermore, the Court examined whether the agreement was genuinely negotiated and whether it was in the best interests of the employees.
In delivering the judgment, the Court found that the SUEZ SAWT Agreement 2021 was a genuinely negotiated agreement that contained all the mandatory terms prescribed by the Fair Work Act. The Court also determined that the agreement was in the best interests of the employees and did not contain any provisions that would be detrimental to their rights or entitlements. Consequently, the Court approved the SUEZ SAWT Agreement 2021, endorsing its implementation within the organisation.
The Court's decision was grounded in its analysis of the evidence presented and the relevant legislative framework. By approving the SUEZ SAWT Agreement 2021, the Court ensured that the employees would benefit from a fair and balanced agreement that met the necessary criteria for endorsement. This decision provides guidance for both employers and employees in negotiating and implementing enterprise agreements within the waste management sector and beyond.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.