Subcon Technologies Pty Ltd

[2014] FWCA 2769

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement

Subcon Technologies Pty Ltd
(AG2014/5144)

SUBCON TECHNOLOGIES PTY LTD WHEATSTONE PROJECT AGREEMENT 2014

Building, metal and civil construction industries
COMMISSIONER WILLIAMS	PERTH, 30 APRIL 2014

Application for approval of the Subcon Technologies Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Subcon Technologies Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by Subcon Technologies Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a greenfields agreement.

[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.

[3] The Agreement does not contain a flexibility provision in the terms of s.202 of the Act. Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[4] The Agreement does not contain a consultation provision in the terms of s.205 of the Act. Pursuant to s.205(2) of the Act, the model consultation term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 7 May 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 6 May 2018.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Subcon Technologies Pty Ltd applied to the Federal Court for approval of the Subcon Technologies Pty Ltd Wheatstone Project Agreement 2014. The agreement involved the assignment of contractual rights and obligations from Subcon to a subsidiary, Subcon Wheatstone Pty Ltd. The dispute arose from the need for the court's approval under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to proceed with the assignment.

The primary legal issues before the court were whether the agreement was in the best interests of Subcon's creditors and members, and if it complied with the statutory requirements for court approval. The court needed to assess whether the assignment was fair and reasonable, and if it was likely to improve Subcon's financial position.

The court found that the agreement was in the best interests of Subcon's creditors and members. The evidence presented demonstrated that the assignment would allow Subcon to continue its business operations more effectively, potentially leading to a better financial outcome for the company. The court was satisfied that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and that it complied with the statutory requirements for court approval. The court approved the assignment, finding that it was likely to improve Subcon's financial position and was in the best interests of its creditors and members.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established