Su, Stephen Tien-Ping v Tax Agents Board of South Australia

[1982] FCA 287

I N THE	FEDERAL	COURT	OF	AUSTRALIA	)
1

S O U T H	A U S T R A L I A	D I S T R I C T	R E G I S T R Y	j	S.	A.	N o .	G 2 1	of	1 9 8 2
1

GENERAL D I V I S I O N 1

ON A P P E A L f r o m t h e A d m i n i s t r a f l v e

A p p e a l s 'Tribunal General A d m i n i s t r a t i v e

D i v i s i o n I n t h e m a t t e r o f A p p l i c a t i o n

f o r R e v l e w N o . S81/71

BETIFEEN :

S T E P H E N T I E N - P I N G S U

Applicant

AND :	-
TAX  AGENTS BOARD OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA

R e s p o n d e n t

. . .

O R D E R

J U D G E S :	FOX J . , WOODWARD J .	and McGREGOR	J .	'
DATE	OF	ORDER:	1 2 N o v e m b e r	1982

WHERE MADE : A d e l a i d e

TIIE COURT ORDERS THAT:

T h e appeal be d i s m i s s e d w i t h costs .

In o u r v iew, the appea l must be dismissed.

T h i s Court can only dea l on t h i s a p p e a l with ques t ions o f

law. On a p rope r ana lys i s o f t he appe l l an t ' s a rgumen t s ,

we a r e o f t h e view t h a t no such quest ion has been ra ised.

The argument of counse l f o r t h e a p p e l l a n t amounted t o no

more than criticism o f t h e way the Tribunal had marshal led

the evldence and the welght i t had given t o v a r i o u s

c o n s i d e r a t i o n s a r l s i n g t h e r e f r o m .

1Ve can add t ha t t he re was , i n o u r opinion, ample

evidence	upon	whlch	the	Tribunal	could	reach	the	conclusion
it	d id .	The	appeal	should	be	dismissed	with	c o s t s and we
s o o r d e r .	1Ve	make	no	o rde r 111 r e s p e c t of	t h e	c o s t s	o f	t h e

n o t i c e o f motion.

. ..

I certify that thls and thc

preccding page is a true copy

of the judgment of their

Honours Mr. Justice Fox, bfr.
Justice Woodward and hk. Justlce

NcGregor .

&dtu QchiiGnlo

Assoclate

Date:  f 2 d O V 1982.