Su (Migration)

[2018] AATA 2967

Su (Migration) [2018] AATA 2967 (3 July 2018)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Chun-Wei Su

CASE NUMBER:  1725210

DIBP REFERENCE(S):  BCC2017/2342214

MEMBER:P. Wood

DATE:3 July 2018

PLACE OF DECISION:  Melbourne, Victoria

DECISION:The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:

·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

Statement made on 03 July 2018 at 12:40pm

CATCHWORDS

Migration – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – English language proficiency – Changes to legislative instrument – Unclear what English language proficiency requirements apply – Decision under review remitted

LEGISLATION

Migration Act 1958, s 65

Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2, cl 500.213

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).

2. The applicant applied for the visa on 30 June 2017. The delegate refused to grant the visa on 26 September 2017.

3. Cl. 500.213(3)(a) specifies that the Minister may, by legislative instrument, specify the requirements for the purposes of cl. 500.213(1).

4. IMMI18/015 is the legislative instrument which seeks to specify the English language proficiency requirements for Subclass 500 student visa applicants for the purposes of cl. 500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994.

5. Section 7 of IMMI18/015 states that the instrument applies to an application for a Subclass 500 visa made on or after the commencement of the instrument, 6 June 2018.

6. Significantly, schedule 2 to the instrument states that IMMI18/015 repeals the previous instrument, IMMI16/019, with the exception that the previous instrument will continue to apply in relation to an applicant who meets either of the following requirements:

   a.The applicant completed the TOEFL-PBT test before 14 October 2017 and achieved the specified score within a certain period; or

   b.The applicant completed the TOEFL-PBT test on or after 14 October 2017 but before the commencement of IMMI18/015 and achieved the specified score within a certain period.

7. IMMI18/015 makes no reference to applications for a Subclass 500 visa made before its commencement where an applicant did not undertake the TOEFL-PBT test or did not achieve the required score. As such, it is unclear what English language proficiency requirements apply to the applicant.

8. In light of this, the Tribunal has determined that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.

   DECISION

9. The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 500 visa:

   ·cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Regulations

   P. Wood
   Senior Member