| [2015] FWCA 1163 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Study Group Australia Pty Ltd
(AG2014/10455)
TAYLORS ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROGRAM (WATERLOO) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2015
Educational services | |
VICE PRESIDENT LAWLER | SYDNEY, 18 FEBRUARY 2015 |
Application for approval of the Taylors English Language Program (Waterloo) Enterprise Agreement 2015.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Taylors English Language Program (Waterloo) Enterprise Agreement 2015 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Study Group Australia Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] Subject to a concern that has been addressed by way of an undertaking, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] As noted, pursuant to s.190(3), I have accepted an undertaking from Study Group Australia Pty Ltd . In accordance with s.191(1) of the Act the undertaking is taken to be a term of the Agreement. A copy of the undertaking is attached to this decision.
[4] The Independent Education Union of Australia, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s. 201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
[5] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 25 February 2015. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2017.
VICE PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE412675 PR561168>
- AGLC
- Study Group Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FWCA 1163
- Case
- [2015] FWCA 1163
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Fair Work Commission approved the Taylors English Language Program (Waterloo) Enterprise Agreement 2015 as a low-paid agreement. The Commission found that the agreement was the product of good faith bargaining and that it met the requirements of section 231 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission also found that the agreement was in the public interest because it provided for a wage increase and improvements to the employees' working conditions. The Commission noted that the employees covered by the agreement were low-paid and low-skilled, and that the agreement provided for a modest increase in their wages and conditions. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was fair and reasonable, and that it would not have an adverse effect on the employees or the community. The Commission made an order for the registration of the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.