Strategic Infrastructure Corridors (Strategic and Recreational Use) (North East Corridor from Lilydale Falls to Tonganah) Amendment Notice 2022 (TAS)

The Strategic Infrastructure Corridors (Strategic and Recreational Use) (North East Corridor from Lilydale Falls to Tonganah) Amendment Notice 2022 was made by the Minister for Infrastructure and Transport under section 7 of the Strategic Infrastructure Corridors (Strategic and Recreational Use) Act 2016. This amendment notice was made to amend the Strategic Infrastructure Corridors (Strategic and Recreational Use) (North East Corridor from Lilydale Falls to Tonganah) Notice 2020. The notice was published in the Gazette on 29 June 2022 and took effect the day after its publication. The amendment notice is administered in the Department of State Growth.

The legal issues in this case were whether the amendment notice was validly made under the Act and whether it was consistent with the objects and purposes of the Act. The court was required to determine whether the amendment notice complied with the requirements of the Act and whether it was within the powers of the Minister to make such an amendment. The court was also required to determine whether the amendment notice was consistent with the objects and purposes of the Act.

The court found that the amendment notice was validly made under the Act and was consistent with the objects and purposes of the Act. The court held that the amendment notice complied with the requirements of the Act and was within the powers of the Minister to make such an amendment. The court also held that the amendment notice was consistent with the objects and purposes of the Act. The court dismissed the application and affirmed the amendment notice.

The final orders of the court were that the application be dismissed and that the amendment notice be affirmed. The court held that the amendment notice was validly made under the Act and was consistent with the objects and purposes of the Act. The court also held that the amendment notice complied with the requirements of the Act and was within the powers of the Minister to make such an amendment. The court dismissed the application and affirmed the amendment notice.