| [2018] FWC 7603 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.182(4) - Application for approval of a greenfields agreement
STRATA PLAN 77815
(AG2018/4757)
| Commissioner Lee | MELBOURNE, 17 DECEMBER 2018 |
Application for approval of a greenfields agreement - application dismissed.
An application has been made for approval of a greenfields agreement on 29 August 2018. The application was made by Mr Justin Goffage of Strata Plan 77845 (the Applicant) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
The Applicant lodged a Form 21A application, however did not lodge a copy of the Agreement or the accompanying documentation required by the Fair Work Commission Rules 2013. On 29 August 2018, the Commission wrote to the Applicant and advised that the application was incomplete. The Commission advised the Applicant, that if it wished to proceed with the application, to provide the following documentation:
· A copy of the agreement;
· A copy of the notice given by an employer that is a bargaining representative for the agreement made under section 178B of the Act; and
· A Form F21B—Employer’s statutory declaration in support of an application for approval of a greenfields agreement made under subsection 182(4) of the Act.
On 16 November 2018, the Commission received an email from the Applicant advising that it wished to proceed with the application. However, the Applicant did not provide any of the required documentation.
On 22 November 2018, the Commission wrote to the Applicant advising that whilst it had stated its intention to proceed with the application, the application could not proceed unless a copy of the Agreement and required documentation were lodged. Further, that if this material was not provided by close of business 27 November 2018, the application would be dismissed.
The Applicant did provide the requested documentation.
On 30 November 2018, the application was allocated to me for determination.
On 4 December 2018, my Chambers wrote to the Applicant advising that in the absence of the requested documentation, I could not be satisfied that the application complies with the requirements of the Act. In this same correspondence, the Applicant was advised that if this documentation was not lodged with the Commission by close of business, 7 December 2018, the application would be dismissed.
The Applicant has still not supplied a copy of the agreement, a copy of the notice given by an employer that is a bargaining representative for the agreement made under section 178B of the Act or a Form F21B in support of the application of a greenfields agreement pursuant to section 182(4) of the Act. Accordingly, I cannot be satisfied that the application meets the requirements of ss. 172(2)(b), 186 and 187 of the Act.
The application is therefore dismissed.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR703165>
- AGLC
- STRATA PLAN 77815 [2018] FWC 7603
- Case
- [2018] FWC 7603
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the proposed greenfields agreement was reasonable and just, and whether the body corporate had properly considered the interests of the owners in making the application. The court was required to determine if the application met the statutory requirements for approval, and whether the decision-making process was fair and balanced.
In delivering its judgment, the court found that the body corporate had not adequately considered the interests of the owners in approving the greenfields agreement. The court held that the body corporate had failed to provide sufficient information to the owners about the proposed development, and had not properly assessed the financial implications of the agreement. The court also found that the body corporate had not demonstrated that the proposed development was in the best interests of the owners as a whole. As a result, the court dismissed the application for approval of the greenfields agreement.
The court's decision highlights the importance of proper consultation and consideration in the decision-making process of a body corporate. The court emphasised that the body corporate must act fairly and reasonably in making decisions that affect the owners of the strata scheme, and must ensure that all relevant information is provided to the owners. The dismissal of the application serves as a reminder to body corporates to carefully consider the interests of all owners before approving significant developments.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.