| [2017] FWCA 2474 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement
Stowe Australia Pty Limited T/A Stowe
(AG2017/1532)
STOWE AUSTRALIA PTY LTD - NEWCASTLE AND CENTRAL COAST ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2016
Electrical contracting industry | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT LAWRENCE | SYDNEY, 4 MAY 2017 |
Application for variation of the Stowe Australia Pty Ltd - Newcastle and Central Coast Enterprise Agreement 2016.
[1] An application pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) has been made by Stowe Australia Pty Ltd TA Stowe (“the Employer”) for variation to the Stowe Australia Pty Ltd - Newcastle and Central Coast Enterprise Agreement 2016 [AE420287] (“the Agreement”). The application was lodged on 2 May 2017.
[2] In addition to Form F23 – Application for Approval of Variation of Enterprise Agreement - the Applicant provided to the Commission a statutory declaration from Mr Danny Atkinson, General Manager NSW & ACT/Director. Also provided was a memorandum to all employees concerning the variation and in which the variation was set out. The memorandum was dated 12 April 2017.
[3] The variation involves various changes to the Agreement which include the following matters:
● Accrued RDOs;
● Various allowances;
● Superannuation payments and income protection insurance;
● Public holidays;
● Wage rates;
● Profit share.
[4] The variations to the Agreement can be found at Annexure A to this decision.
[5] The application has met the statutory requirements in all requisite respects. The variation was provided to all relevant employees prior to the ballot. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act, have been satisfied.
[6] The variation was approved by a majority of employees, in accordance with s.209 on 20 April 2017.
[7] The variation to the Agreement is approved and will come into operation from 4 May 2017.
[8] A consolidated version of the agreement, as varied is attached to this decision at Appendix B.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Appendix A
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE420287 PR592660>
- AGLC
- Stowe Australia Pty Limited T/A Stowe [2017] FWCA 2474
- Case
- [2017] FWCA 2474
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the proposed variations to the enterprise agreement were justified under the Fair Work Act 2009, and whether they met the criteria for being considered "in the national interest." Specifically, the Commission needed to assess whether the changes proposed by Stowe were necessary to address economic, social, or productivity issues, and whether they would have a minimal impact on the workforce.
The Commission, after reviewing the evidence and arguments presented by both parties, found that the proposed variations were reasonable and in the national interest. The evidence indicated that the changes were necessary to ensure the continued viability and competitiveness of Stowe in a rapidly changing market. The Commission was satisfied that the proposed variations would not adversely affect the employees and would, in fact, contribute to the overall productivity and efficiency of the company. The decision was made in the context of balancing the rights and interests of the employer and the employees, ensuring that the changes would not undermine the fundamental protections provided under the Fair Work Act.
As a result of the Commission's decision, the application for the variation of the Newcastle and Central Coast Enterprise Agreement 2016 was approved. The final orders included specific terms and conditions that reflected the changes agreed upon by the parties, while also maintaining the core protections for employees. The decision provides a clear framework for future negotiations and amendments to enterprise agreements, highlighting the importance of flexibility and adaptability in the employment landscape.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.