Stone v ACN 000 337 940 Pty Ltd

Link copied
Case Copied 13 min read

Reported Decision:

68 ACSR 242

New South Wales


Supreme Court


CITATION: Stone v ACN 000 337 940 Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1058
HEARING DATE(S): 07/10/08
 
JUDGMENT DATE : 

9 October 2008
JURISDICTION: Equity Division
Corporations List
JUDGMENT OF: Barrett J
DECISION: Proceedings adjourned.
CATCHWORDS: CORPORATIONS - deregistered company - application for order that ASIC reinstate registration - applicant wishes to pursue proceedings against company in Dust Diseases Tribunal - whether plaintiff may proceed direct against insured without reinstatement of company's registration - not shown that he can - various factors relevant to whether reinstatement "just" - company in liquidation immediately before deregistration - need to re-install liquidator - former liquidator should be appointed unless unable or unwilling to act
LEGISLATION CITED: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 601AG, 601AH(2), 601AH(3). 601AH(5)
CATEGORY: Principal judgment
CASES CITED: Almario v Allianz Australia Workers Compensation (NSW) Insurance Ltd [2005] NSWCA 19; (2005) 62 NSWLR 148
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2000] NSWSC 316; (2000) 34 ACSR 232
Del Borrello v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2008] WASC 48
Gorman v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2008] FCA 962
Hutchinson v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2001] VSC 465; (2001) 40 ACSR 198
J P Morgan Portfolio Services Ltd v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu [2008] FCA 433; (2008) 65 ACSR 636
Orica Ltd v CGU Insurance Ltd [2003] NSWCA 331; (2003) 59 NSWLR 15
Pagnon v WorkCover Queensland [2000] QCA 421; [2001] 2 QdR 492
Ramantanis v G & M Excavations Pty Ltd [2003] NSWSC 250; (2004) 22 ACLC 22
Suncorp Metway Insurance Ltd v Clonmel Pty Ltd [2000] QSC 135; [2001] 2 QdR 94
PARTIES: John Albert Stone - Plaintiff
ACN 000 337 940 Pty Ltd - Defendant
FILE NUMBER(S): SC 5076/08
COUNSEL: Mr A P Cheshire - Plaintiff
Mr S Ingate - Former Director of Defendant
SOLICITORS: Turner Freeman - Plaintiff
Ingate & Associates - Former Director of Defendant


IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
EQUITY DIVISION
CORPORATIONS LIST

BARRETT J

THURSDAY 9 OCTOBER 2008

5076/08 JOHN ALBERT STONE v ACN 000 337 940 PTY LTD

JUDGMENT

1 The plaintiff seeks an order under s 601AH(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) directing Australian Securities and Investments Commission to reinstate the registration of the company formerly named Rigby Jones Pty Ltd which, in 2002, changed its name to correspond with its Australian Company Number (with the addition of “Pty Ltd”). It will be convenient to refer to it as “Rigby Jones”.

2 The application is opposed by Mr Ingate who was the sole director of Rigby Jones at the time of its deregistration.

3 Rigby Jones was deregistered on 20 May 2006 pursuant to s 509 of the Corporations Act upon completion of a members voluntary winding up.

4 The plaintiff is a former employee of Rigby Jones. By statement of claim filed on 13 June 2008, he commenced (or purported to commence) proceedings in the Dust…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Stone v ACN 000 337 940 Pty Ltd and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2008] NSWSC 1058
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, Stone, the plaintiff, brought an application against ACN 000 337 940 Pty Ltd, the defendant, seeking an order that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) reinstate the company's registration. The plaintiff sought to pursue proceedings against the company in the Dust Diseases Tribunal. The primary issue before the court was whether the plaintiff could proceed directly against the insured without the reinstatement of the company's registration. The court held that the plaintiff had not demonstrated that they could proceed directly against the insured.

The court examined the relevant factors to determine whether reinstatement of the company's registration was "just" in the circumstances. It found that the company was in liquidation immediately before its deregistration. Consequently, the court considered it appropriate to reinstall the liquidator. The court concluded that the former liquidator should be appointed to the role, unless they were unable or unwilling to act. The court's decision hinged on the need to ensure that the liquidator's role was effectively reinstated to facilitate the proper conduct of any proceedings against the insured.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.