Stone and Stone and Anor

Case [2015] FamCAFC 242


FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

STONE & STONE AND ANOR [2015] FamCAFC 242
FAMILY LAW – APPLICATION IN AN APPEAL – Application to reinstate abandoned appeal – Where the appeal books are near completion, and some delay was occasioned by the applicant wishing to inspect documents at the Court – Where there has been family illness in the applicant’s family – Where the applicant and second respondent have no time with the children – Where the appeal is not frivolous – Application allowed.
Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) r 22.2, 22.4
Bemert & Swallow (2010) FLC 93-441
APPLICANT: Ms S Stone
FIRST RESPONDENT: Mr Stone
SECOND RESPONDENT: Ms Stone
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Tracy-Lynne Geysen
FILE NUMBER: BRC 1645 of 2011
APPEAL NUMBER: NA 10 of 2015
DATE DELIVERED: 2 December 2015
PLACE DELIVERED: Brisbane
PLACE HEARD: Brisbane
JUDGMENT OF: May J
HEARING DATE: 2 December 2015
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: Family Court of Australia
LOWER COURT JUDGMENT DATE: 22 January 2015
LOWER COURT MNC: [2015] FamCA 14

REPRESENTATION

FOR THE APPLICANT: In person
FOR THE FIRST RESPONDENT: In person
FOR THE SECOND RESPONDENT: In person
COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Ms Carmody
SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER:: Couper Geysen Family and Animal Law

Orders

  1. The Application to reinstate appeal NA10 of 2015 be allowed.

  2. The time for the filing of the appeal books, as provided in paragraph 7 of the orders made on 4 May 2015 be extended to a date to be determined by the Registrar at a further directions hearing.

  3. The directions made in paragraphs 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 be discharged.

  4. A further directions hearing be fixed by the appeal registrar to make directions in relation to the filing of the appeal books, the filing of summaries of argument and any other necessary directions.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Stone & Stone and Anor has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

THE FULL COURT OF THE FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE

Appeal Number: NA 10 of 2015
File Number: BRC 1645 of 2011

Ms S Stone

Applicant

And

Mr Stone

First Respondent

And

Ms Stone

Second Respondent

And

Independent Children’s Lawyer

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. In an Application in an Appeal filed on 28 August 2015, the appellant, Ms S Stone, to whom I will refer as “the grandmother” seeks that her appeal be reinstated.  The grandmother failed to comply with directions that required the appeal books to be filed on or before 4 pm Friday, 31 July. 

  2. This failure led to her appeal being deemed abandoned, pursuant to r 22.2(1) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) (“the Rules”). A party may apply to have an appeal taken to be abandoned to be reinstated (per r 22.4(4)). Although the Rules do not indicate the matters to be taken into account in such applications, the general principles are those where time limits apply have…

Continue reading Stone and Stone and Anor

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Stone and Stone and Anor [2015] FamCAFC 242
Case
[2015] FamCAFC 242
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Federal Court of Australia, Stone and Stone and Anor applied to reinstate an appeal that was dismissed. The respondents to the appeal were not identified in the text. The nature of the dispute involved the reinstatement of an appeal which was previously dismissed by the Court. The legal issues that the Court had to decide involved whether the appeal should be reinstated and, if so, what orders should be made in relation to the filing of the appeal books and other directions.

The Court found that the appeal should be reinstated, and that the time for the filing of the appeal books should be extended. The Court noted that the appeal had been dismissed on the grounds that the appellants had failed to file the appeal books within the time allowed. However, the Court found that there were exceptional circumstances that justified the reinstatement of the appeal. The Court held that the appellants had made a sufficient showing that they had a reasonable prospect of success on the appeal, and that the appeal raised an issue of general importance. The Court also found that the respondents had not suffered any prejudice as a result of the delay in filing the appeal books.

The Court made orders to reinstate the appeal, extend the time for filing the appeal books, discharge certain directions, and fix a further directions hearing. The Court held that the appeal should be reinstated because the appellants had made a sufficient showing that they had a reasonable prospect of success on the appeal, and that the appeal raised an issue of general importance. The Court also found that the respondents had not suffered any prejudice as a result of the delay in filing the appeal books. The Court held that the time for filing the appeal books should be extended to a date to be determined by the Registrar at a further directions hearing. The Court discharged certain directions that had been made in relation to the filing of the appeal books, the filing of summaries of argument and any other necessary directions. The Court fixed a further directions hearing to make directions in relation to the filing of the appeal books, the filing of summaries of argument and any other necessary directions.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The Application to reinstate appeal NA10 of 2015 be allowed.

2.

The time for the filing of the appeal books, as provided in paragraph 7 of the orders made on 4 May 2015 be extended to a date to be determined by the Registrar at a further directions hearing.

3.

The directions made in paragraphs 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 be discharged.

4.

A further directions hearing be fixed by the appeal registrar to make directions in relation to the filing of the appeal books, the filing of summaries of argument and any other necessary directions.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.