FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| STONE & STONE AND ANOR | [2015] FamCAFC 242 |
| FAMILY LAW – APPLICATION IN AN APPEAL – Application to reinstate abandoned appeal – Where the appeal books are near completion, and some delay was occasioned by the applicant wishing to inspect documents at the Court – Where there has been family illness in the applicant’s family – Where the applicant and second respondent have no time with the children – Where the appeal is not frivolous – Application allowed. |
| Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) r 22.2, 22.4 |
| Bemert & Swallow (2010) FLC 93-441 |
| APPLICANT: | Ms S Stone |
| FIRST RESPONDENT: | Mr Stone |
| SECOND RESPONDENT: | Ms Stone |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Tracy-Lynne Geysen |
| FILE NUMBER: | BRC | 1645 | of | 2011 |
| APPEAL NUMBER: | NA | 10 | of | 2015 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 2 December 2015 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Brisbane |
| PLACE HEARD: | Brisbane |
| JUDGMENT OF: | May J |
| HEARING DATE: | 2 December 2015 |
| LOWER COURT JURISDICTION: | Family Court of Australia |
| LOWER COURT JUDGMENT DATE: | 22 January 2015 |
| LOWER COURT MNC: | [2015] FamCA 14 |
REPRESENTATION
| FOR THE APPLICANT: | In person |
| FOR THE FIRST RESPONDENT: | In person |
| FOR THE SECOND RESPONDENT: | In person |
| COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Ms Carmody |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER:: | Couper Geysen Family and Animal Law |
Orders
The Application to reinstate appeal NA10 of 2015 be allowed.
The time for the filing of the appeal books, as provided in paragraph 7 of the orders made on 4 May 2015 be extended to a date to be determined by the Registrar at a further directions hearing.
The directions made in paragraphs 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 be discharged.
A further directions hearing be fixed by the appeal registrar to make directions in relation to the filing of the appeal books, the filing of summaries of argument and any other necessary directions.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Stone & Stone and Anor has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| THE FULL COURT OF THE FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT BRISBANE |
Appeal Number: NA 10 of 2015
File Number: BRC 1645 of 2011
| Ms S Stone |
Applicant
And
| Mr Stone |
First Respondent
And
| Ms Stone |
Second Respondent
And
| Independent Children’s Lawyer |
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
In an Application in an Appeal filed on 28 August 2015, the appellant, Ms S Stone, to whom I will refer as “the grandmother” seeks that her appeal be reinstated. The grandmother failed to comply with directions that required the appeal books to be filed on or before 4 pm Friday, 31 July.
This failure led to her appeal being deemed abandoned, pursuant to r 22.2(1) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) (“the Rules”). A party may apply to have an appeal taken to be abandoned to be reinstated (per r 22.4(4)). Although the Rules do not indicate the matters to be taken into account in such applications, the general principles are those where time limits apply have…
Continue reading Stone and Stone and Anor
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Stone and Stone and Anor [2015] FamCAFC 242
- Case
- [2015] FamCAFC 242
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court found that the appeal should be reinstated, and that the time for the filing of the appeal books should be extended. The Court noted that the appeal had been dismissed on the grounds that the appellants had failed to file the appeal books within the time allowed. However, the Court found that there were exceptional circumstances that justified the reinstatement of the appeal. The Court held that the appellants had made a sufficient showing that they had a reasonable prospect of success on the appeal, and that the appeal raised an issue of general importance. The Court also found that the respondents had not suffered any prejudice as a result of the delay in filing the appeal books.
The Court made orders to reinstate the appeal, extend the time for filing the appeal books, discharge certain directions, and fix a further directions hearing. The Court held that the appeal should be reinstated because the appellants had made a sufficient showing that they had a reasonable prospect of success on the appeal, and that the appeal raised an issue of general importance. The Court also found that the respondents had not suffered any prejudice as a result of the delay in filing the appeal books. The Court held that the time for filing the appeal books should be extended to a date to be determined by the Registrar at a further directions hearing. The Court discharged certain directions that had been made in relation to the filing of the appeal books, the filing of summaries of argument and any other necessary directions. The Court fixed a further directions hearing to make directions in relation to the filing of the appeal books, the filing of summaries of argument and any other necessary directions.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Application to reinstate appeal NA10 of 2015 be allowed.
2.
The time for the filing of the appeal books, as provided in paragraph 7 of the orders made on 4 May 2015 be extended to a date to be determined by the Registrar at a further directions hearing.
3.
The directions made in paragraphs 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 be discharged.
4.
A further directions hearing be fixed by the appeal registrar to make directions in relation to the filing of the appeal books, the filing of summaries of argument and any other necessary directions.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.