Stokey v Dye & Anor

Case [2023] HCASL 102


STOKEY

v

DYE & ANOR

[2023] HCASL 102
P12/2023

  1. The applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) Appellate Jurisdiction (Aldridge J). The application does not raise any question of general principle and has insufficient prospects of success. It would therefore be futile to grant the extension of time that is sought. Special leave should be refused.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

M.M Gordon S.H.P Steward
3 August 2023

Continue reading Stokey v Dye & Anor

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Stokey v Dye & Anor [2023] HCASL 102
Case
[2023] HCASL 102
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case of Stokey v Dye & Anor involves an application for an extension of time to seek special leave to appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia. The applicant seeks the extension from the High Court, which is reviewing the application under its appellate jurisdiction. The decision being appealed relates to a matter of family law, although the specifics of the case are not detailed in the summary.

The legal issue before the court was whether to grant the applicant's request for an extension of time. The court had to consider the futility of the application, the lack of any question of general principle, and the insufficient prospects of success. These factors were critical in determining whether the extension should be granted or not.

The High Court found that the application did not raise any question of general principle and had insufficient prospects of success. The court considered it futile to grant the extension of time sought by the applicant. As a result, the court refused special leave. The court's reasoning was based on the principles that an extension should not be granted if it is futile and that the applicant must demonstrate that the appeal has sufficient prospects of success. The High Court then directed the Registrar to prepare an order dismissing the application, which was signed and sealed on 3 August 2023.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.