STOKEY
v
DYE & ANOR
[2023] HCASL 102
P12/2023
The applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Division 1) Appellate Jurisdiction (Aldridge J). The application does not raise any question of general principle and has insufficient prospects of success. It would therefore be futile to grant the extension of time that is sought. Special leave should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
M.M Gordon S.H.P Steward 3 August 2023
Continue reading Stokey v Dye & Anor
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Stokey v Dye & Anor [2023] HCASL 102
- Case
- [2023] HCASL 102
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the court was whether to grant the applicant's request for an extension of time. The court had to consider the futility of the application, the lack of any question of general principle, and the insufficient prospects of success. These factors were critical in determining whether the extension should be granted or not.
The High Court found that the application did not raise any question of general principle and had insufficient prospects of success. The court considered it futile to grant the extension of time sought by the applicant. As a result, the court refused special leave. The court's reasoning was based on the principles that an extension should not be granted if it is futile and that the applicant must demonstrate that the appeal has sufficient prospects of success. The High Court then directed the Registrar to prepare an order dismissing the application, which was signed and sealed on 3 August 2023.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.