District Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Stobbe v Swadling Developments Pty Ltd [2024] NSWDC 290 Hearing dates: 8-9 July 2024 Date of orders: 16 July 2024 Decision date: 16 July 2024 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Newlinds SC DCJ Decision: (1) Enter judgement in favour of the Plaintiff in an amount to be agreed or assessed.
(2) Direct the parties to bring in short minutes of order consistent with these reasons. If there is any aspect of the quantification of the Plaintiff's claim that needs further consideration, I will hear the parties.
(3) Prima facie the Plaintiff is entitled to an order for costs, but I will hear from any party if they wish a departure from that usual result.
Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE – Workplace accident – Carpenter working on building site pursuant to subcontract injured when sheets of gyprock left in rain collapsed on him – Civil Liability Act – Risk of harm – Precautions – Causation – Contributory negligence - Damages
Legislation Cited: Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) s 5B(1); s 5B(2)
Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW) s 19(3); s 20(2)
Cases Cited: Geoffrey Barker v A J Zanco Pty Ltd t/as Krack Solutions [2023] NSWDC 43
Gomez v Woolworths Group Limited [2023] NSWDC 221
Liccardy v Daniel Payne t/as Sussex Inlet Pontoons Pty Ltd and Anor [2022] NSWDC 246
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Kurt Stobbe (Plaintiff)
Swadling Developments Pty Ltd (Defendant)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
K Andrews (Plaintiff)
M Maconachie (Defendant)
Leitch Hasson Dent (Plaintiff)
Tony Cox Lawyers & Conveyancers (Defendant)
File Number(s): 2023/85713 Publication restriction: Nil
JUDGMENT
Introduction
-
By amended statement of claim filed 3 November 2023, the Plaintiff claims damages against the Defendant for injuries and ongoing disabilities he sustained in an accident at a building site at 5-7 Everard Street Port Macquarie on 16 March 2020.
-
On that day, the Plaintiff, who was a self-employed carpenter, was working on the site for the Defendant pursuant to a subcontract. The Defendant was the builder and/or principal contractor for building work which was being undertaken on the site.
-
16 March 2020 was a Monday. It was raining and had been raining over the weekend. In the morning, the Plaintiff attended the site and was directed to assist with carrying out certain gyprocking and other carpentry duties, in particular some installation of gyprock that was required in the part of the site known as “Unit 9”.
-
At around lunchtime on the day, the Plaintiff, who had been working in Unit 9, was going to lunch. He noticed that approximately 10 or so large sheets of gyprock, which were leaning against the wall outside Unit 9, were getting wet because it was raining and had been raining most of the day and that a sheet of plastic which had been covering in part that gyprock had come adrift. He remembers bending over to try and get hold of the plastic so as to cover the gyprock when the sheets of gyprock collapsed on him, causing significant injuries to…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Stobbe v Swadling Developments Pty Ltd and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2024] NSWDC 290
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court had to determine if Swadling Developments Pty Ltd was negligent in leaving the gyprock sheets exposed to the rain, and if such negligence caused the plaintiff's injuries. Additionally, it was necessary to consider if the plaintiff contributed to his injuries and whether he was entitled to compensation. The court also examined the application of the Civil Liability Act in assessing the risk of harm, the precautions taken, and the causation and contributory negligence principles.
In its judgment, the court found that Swadling Developments Pty Ltd was negligent in not ensuring the gyprock sheets were stored safely, thereby exposing Mr. Stobbe to an unreasonable risk of harm. The court found that the risk of the gyprock collapsing was foreseeable and that reasonable precautions should have been taken. The plaintiff's contributory negligence was also considered, but it was found that it did not bar his claim. The court determined that the plaintiff was entitled to damages for his injuries, and that he could claim costs unless any party opposed this outcome.
The court ordered judgement in favour of the plaintiff, with the amount of damages to be agreed upon or assessed. The parties were directed to prepare minutes of order and to bring any unresolved issues regarding the quantification of damages to the court. The plaintiff was prima facie entitled to an order for costs, but the court invited any party to argue against this if they wished.
Orders
Orders of the court
(1) Enter judgement in favour of the Plaintiff in an amount to be agreed or assessed.
(2) Direct the parties to bring in short minutes of order consistent with these reasons. If there is any aspect of the quantification of the Plaintiff's claim that needs further consideration, I will hear the parties.
(3) Prima facie the Plaintiff is entitled to an order for costs, but I will hear from any party if they wish a departure from that usual result.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.