[2001] QCA 307
COURT OF APPEAL
McMURDO P
THOMAS JA
ATKINSON J
Appeal No 8947 of 2000
RUSSELL WILTON STEWART AND
ANNE-MAREE STEWART Applicants/Respondents
and
GYMBOREE PTY LTD
(ACN 010 535 485) First Respondent/Appellant
and
ANDREA MARGARET GRAHAM Second Respondent/Second Appellant
BRISBANE
..DATE 03/08/2001
JUDGMENT
DAVIES JA: This matter was heard by a Court consisting of the President, Justice Thomas and Justice Atkinson.
The appeal is dismissed with costs.
I publish the separate reasons for judgment of each member of the Court concurring as to those orders.
-----
- AGLC
- Stewart v Gymboree Pty Ltd [2001] QCA 307
- Case
- [2001] QCA 307
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the Court of Appeal were whether the primary judge had erred in finding that Gymboree Pty Ltd and Andrea Margaret Graham were liable for the damages awarded to the Stewarts. The Court of Appeal found that the primary judge's decision was correct and that Gymboree Pty Ltd and Graham were liable for the damages awarded. The Court held that the Stewarts were not contributory negligent in the accident, and that Gymboree Pty Ltd was vicariously liable for the actions of Graham. The Court also found that there was no basis for the argument that the Stewarts had failed to mitigate their losses.
The Court of Appeal found that the primary judge had correctly applied the law and had made no errors of law in his judgment. The Court held that the evidence was sufficient to establish that Gymboree Pty Ltd and Graham were liable for the damages awarded to the Stewarts. The Court found that the Stewarts had suffered injuries as a result of the negligence of Graham, and that Gymboree Pty Ltd was vicariously liable for her actions. The Court held that the Stewarts were not contributory negligent in the accident, and that there was no basis for the argument that they had failed to mitigate their losses.
The appeal was dismissed with costs. The Court ordered that Gymboree Pty Ltd and Graham pay the costs of the appeal and the costs of the proceedings in the primary court. The Court also ordered that the judgment of the primary judge be upheld in all respects.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.