Administrative
Appeals
Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2006] AATA 60
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No Q2004/932
VETERANS' APPEALS DIVISION )
Re DAPHNE STEVENSON Applicant
And
REPATRIATION COMMISSION
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Mr SC Fisher, Member Date27 January 2006
PlaceBrisbane
Decision The Tribunal affirms the decision under review. ..........[Sgd]...........
SC Fisher
Member
CATCHWORDS
VETERANS’ AFFAIRS – application for war-widows pension – operational service – claim conditions were war-caused – application of Statement of Principles – depressive disorder – ischaemic heart disease – psycho-social stressor – decision affirmed.
Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 ss 6, 7, 8, 120, 120A, 196B
Secretary, Department of Social Security v Murphy [1998] FCA 809
Ajka Pty Ltd v Australian Fisheries Management Authority [2003] FCA 248
Bantick and Secretary, Department of Family and Community Services [2003] AATA 472
Bramwell v Repatriation Commission (1998) 51 ALD 56
Collins v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 36 ALR 598
Hillier and Repatriation Commission [2004] AATA 897
Repatriation Commission v Stoddart (2003) 77 ALD 67
Lees v Repatriation Commission (2002) 125 FCR 331
Re Repatriation Commission v Cornelius (2002) FCA 750
Schmidt v Repatriation Commission [2004] FCA 1158
Bull v Repatriation Commission [2001] FCA 1832
Kattenberg v Repatriation Commission [2002] FCA 412
Repatriation Commission v Stoddart [2003] FCAFC 300
Repatriation Commission v Gorton (2001) 110 FCR 321
Haughey and Repatriation Commission [2005] AATA 189
Fenner v Repatriation Commission [2005] FCA 27
Repatriation Commission v Bey (1997) 79 FCR 364
Parnell-Schoeneveld v Repatriation Commission [2003] FCA 153; (2003) 74 ALD 37 Grundman v Repatriation Commission [2001] FCA 892
Re Ahrenfeld and Repatriation Commission (1992) 28 ALD 921
Woodward v Repatriation Commission [2003] FCAFC 160
O’Grady v Northern Queensland Co Ltd (1990) 169 CLR 356
Mines v Repatriation Commission [2004] FCA 1331REASONS FOR DECISION
27 January 2006 Mr SC Fisher, Member Introduction And Background
1. Mr Norman Aitken Stevenson (the veteran) served with the Royal Australian Army from 24 April 1941 until through November 1945. The veteran served in Dutch New Guinea and Morotai from 30 January 1945 until 30 June 1945 (also a period of operational service). The veteran was born on 10 November 1921 and died on 9 May 1985 aged 63 years.
Jurisdiction
2. This appeal is governed by the Veterans’ Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) (“the Act”). The Tribunal has jurisdiction in this appeal by virtue of sections 174 - 176 of the Act. In these Reasons for Decision, references to statutory provisions are to provisions of the Act unless the context indicates otherwise.
The Decision under Review
3. The decision under review is a decision made by the Repatriation Commission (the Respondent) on 14 January 2003 refusing the claim of Mrs Daphne Stevenson that the death of her late husband, Mr Norman Stevenson, was service related. The 14 January 2003 decision was affirmed by the Veterans' Review Board on 2 September 2004. The Applicant appealed to this Tribunal on 7 December 2004.
The Role of the Tribunal
4. The role of the Tribunal…
Continue reading Stevenson and Repatriation Commission
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Stevenson and Repatriation Commission [2006] AATA 60
- Case
- [2006] AATA 60
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The final orders were that the Tribunal affirmed the decision under review, denying the applicant's claim for a war-widow's pension.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Tribunal affirms the decision under review.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.