FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| STEINER & STEINER | [2019] FCCA 1280 |
| Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Property and parenting proceedings – proceedings transferred to the Family Court of Australia – order made. |
| Legislation: Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999, s.39 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, r.8.02 |
| Cases cited: Morris & Rosetti [2017] FamCA 249 |
| Applicant: | MS STEINER |
| Respondent: | MR STEINER |
| File Number: | PAC 1344 of 2016 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Newbrun |
| Hearing date: | 29 April 2019 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 6 May 2019 |
| Delivered at: | Parramatta |
| Delivered on: | 21 May 2019 |
REPRESENTATION
| The Applicant appeared in person |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr Bailey |
ORDERS
These proceedings are forthwith transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Parramatta, with the matter to be mentioned on 29 May 2019 at 9:30 am.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Steiner & Steiner is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PARRAMATTA |
PAC 1344 of 2016
| MS STEINER |
Applicant
And
| MR STEINER |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
The within Reasons for Judgment relate to this Court’s Order of today that these property and parenting proceedings be transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Parramatta.
The husband and wife are both professionals. The wife is self-represented and the husband has legal representation.
On 10 April 2016, property and parenting Orders were made by consent in the Family Court of Australia at Parramatta.
On 21 February 2018 the wife caused the children to commence proceedings in the Equity Division of the Supreme Court of New South Wales against the husband, inter alia, seeking certain orders relating to property. By an Amended Statement of Claim filed pursuant to orders made in that Court on 30 January 2019, the children seek certain declaratory and other relief against the husband in relation to certain property.
On 30 January 2019 the wife filed an Initiating Application in this Court seeking certain relief under section 79A of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), which the husband contends overlaps with the relief sought by the children in the above Supreme Court of NSW proceedings. The husband now seeks an Order that the final relief sought by the wife in her Initiating Application pertaining to her section 79A application, specifically proposed final Orders 8 to 12, be transferred to the Supreme Court of NSW. This issue presently requires determination by the Family Court of Australia. That Court may need to determine, inter alia, whether, in the interests of justice, both the wife’s section 79A application and her additional proposed parenting Orders should be heard in the Family Court of Australia rather than effectively splitting the proceedings into two separate courts.
Issues in dispute
The issues in dispute include the following:
a)Whether the final relief sought by the wife in her Initiating Application pertaining to her section 79A application, specifically proposed final Orders 8 to 12, should be transferred to the Supreme Court of NSW, or…
Continue reading Steiner and Steiner
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Steiner and Steiner [2019] FCCA 1280
- Case
- [2019] FCCA 1280
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was the appropriate jurisdiction for the matter.
Judge Newbrun ordered that the proceedings be forthwith transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Parramatta. The matter was scheduled to be mentioned on 29 May 2019 at 9:30 am.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
These proceedings are forthwith transferred to the Family Court of Australia at Parramatta, with the matter to be mentioned on 29 May 2019 at 9:30 am.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.