| [2022] FWCA 2198 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Stegbar Pty. Limited
(AG2022/2042)
Stegbar Pty Ltd Rowville Shower Screens & Robes Division Enterprise Agreement 2021
| Manufacturing and associated industries | |
| DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOYCE | SYDNEY, 1 JULY 2022 |
Application for approval of the Stegbar Pty Ltd Rowville Shower Screens & Robes Division Enterprise Agreement 2021
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement to be known as the Stegbar Pty Ltd Rowville Shower Screens & Robes Division Enterprise Agreement 2021 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Stegbar Pty. Limited (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
Coverage of employee organisation(s)
The Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (CFMMEU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.
Conclusion
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188 and 190 of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 8 July 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2024.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE516516 PR743249>
- AGLC
- Stegbar Pty. Limited [2022] FWCA 2198
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 2198
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court centred on whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly regarding the provisions that dealt with pay rates, shift patterns, and employee entitlements. The central question was whether the agreement met the requirements for being a "better off overall test" and if it adequately balanced the interests of the employer and employees.
The Fair Work Commission examined the contested provisions and considered the arguments presented by both parties. The court determined that the majority of the agreement complied with the statutory requirements, including the better off overall test. However, certain provisions regarding shift patterns and employee entitlements were found to be deficient. After negotiating amendments to address these concerns, the court found that the revised agreement met the necessary criteria and approved the enterprise agreement. This decision ensured that the employees would benefit from a legally compliant and fair enterprise agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.