Stefanovic v Willoughby City Council

Link copied
Case Copied 10 min read

Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Stefanovic v Willoughby City Council [2024] NSWLEC 1104
Hearing dates: Conciliation Conference on 15 and 16 February 2024
Date of orders: 12 March 2024
Decision date: 12 March 2024
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Byrne AC
Decision:

The Court orders that:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) Development consent is granted to Development Application No DA-2023/78 for demolition of the existing dwelling and construction of a three-storey dwelling, pool and associated site works on land at 44 Sunnyside Crescent, Castlecrag NSW 2068, known as Lot 175 in Deposited Plan 13097, subject to conditions in Annexure A.

Catchwords:

DEVELOPMENT APPEAL – demolition – construction new dwelling house, pool and landscaping – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders

Legislation Cited:

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.16, 8.7, 10.3

Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 34, 34AA

Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, s 38, Sch 7

State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021, Ch 2, 6 s 2.6, Pt 2.3

State Environmental Planning Policy (Building Sustainability Index: BASIX) 2004

State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021

Rural Fires Act 1997, s 100Q

Willoughby Local Environmental Plan 2012, cll 4.4, 4.4A, 4.6, 6.2

Texts Cited:

NSW Rural Fire Service, Planning for Bush Fire Protection, November 2019

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Jasmine Isabelle Stefanovic (Applicant)
Willoughby City Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
R White (Applicant)
M Harker (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Project Lawyers (Applicant)
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/215797
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: This is a Class 1 Development Appeal pursuant to s 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the deemed refusal by Willoughby City Council (the Council) of DA-2023/78 (the Development Application) for demolition of existing dwelling and construction of a new three-storey dwelling, pool and associated site works (the Proposed Development) on land at 44 Sunnyside Crescent, Castlecrag NSW 2068, known as Lot 175 in DP 13097 (the Site).

  2. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on site and at Court. I presided over the conciliation conference.

  3. At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties and which addressed the Council’s contentions. This decision involved Council approving an application to amend the Applicant’s plans pursuant to s 38(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021. The agreed position is for the Court to uphold the Class 1 appeal and grant development consent to the proposed development, as amended subject to conditions at Annexure A.

  4. Section 34(3) of the LEC Act requires me to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision if it is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.

  5. There are jurisdictional prerequisites which require my satisfaction…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Stefanovic v Willoughby City Council and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] NSWLEC 1104
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appellant, Stefanovic, appealed against the decision of the respondent, Willoughby City Council, to refuse development consent for a proposed dwelling and associated site works on land at 44 Sunnyside Crescent, Castlecrag. The matter was heard and determined by the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales. Stefanovic sought development consent for the demolition of an existing dwelling and the construction of a three-storey dwelling, pool and associated site works on the specified land. The Council refused the application on the basis that the proposed development did not comply with the Willoughby Local Environment Plan 2016.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the proposed development complied with the relevant planning instruments and, if not, whether any non-compliance could be justified under the provisions of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). Specifically, the Court needed to determine if the proposed development complied with the Willoughby Local Environment Plan 2016 and whether any non-compliance could be justified under section 87 or section 88 of the Act.

The Court found that while the proposed development did not strictly comply with the Willoughby Local Environment Plan 2016, the non-compliance was minor and could be justified under section 87 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW). The Court held that the benefits of the proposed development, including increased housing supply and improved design, outweighed the minor non-compliance. Consequently, the appeal was upheld, and development consent was granted subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders that:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) Development consent is granted to Development Application No DA-2023/78 for demolition of the existing dwelling and construction of a three-storey dwelling, pool and associated site works on land at 44 Sunnyside Crescent, Castlecrag NSW 2068, known as Lot 175 in Deposited Plan 13097, subject to conditions in Annexure A.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.